See how organizations around the world use Loomio to make better decisions together.
Most HOA software is built for property managers. Here's what boards run by volunteer homeowners actually need.
Case study: →
150 people across three continents, restoring degraded land—and the decisions couldn't wait for the next meeting.
130 people from 32 countries bought apartments together. Now they have to run a business, a community, and a building — democratically.
A 60-year-old recruiting company threw out the org chart, gave every employee the same authority as the CEO, and scaled it to 450 people across three countries.
When the whole internet depends on your library, you can't make decisions behind closed doors anymore.
Behind Zohran Mamdani's historic mayoral primary win was a decision-making system that coordinated 13,000 members with zero paid staff.
Twenty-eight developers spun out of the Ethereum Foundation with no hierarchy, no executives, and a rule that every decision must have everyone's consent.
An experimental reparations-based fund redistributed over $20,000 to members using cooperative decision-making on Loomio.
100 households in wine country — growing to 350 — ditched conventional strata management to govern themselves, and they're building the playbook as they go.
What happens when 80 developers collectively set everyone's salary — and a single objection can block any decision?
As the team grew past 20, the old way of deciding things stopped working.
240 participants from 70 countries, speaking dozens of languages, need to reach consensus — and they've never once had to fall back to a vote.
450 staff, three countries, no positional authority — how does a self-managing company actually make decisions at that scale?
120 open-source developers, fully remote, competing for talent against Silicon Valley — and nothing happens without going through a general assembly.
A cooperative of architects who design sustainable buildings needed their own governance to be just as thoughtfully constructed.
500 people each invested $1,000 in a restaurant that gives 80% of its profits to community projects — now they all have to agree on where the money goes.
A political party stretched across vast Western Australia needed to turn hundreds of voices into unified policy — clause by clause, region by region.
A former refugee who once fled Chile is now pairing newly arriving families with local buddies — and a growing network of volunteers needs to stay coordinated in an increasingly hostile political climate.
700 co-owners, 70 electric cars, 10 cities — and every member gets an equal vote on how the profits are spent.
At this Argentine software cooperative, a designer at step six earns exactly what a developer at step six earns — and every four months the whole team decides who moves up.
Six people read a book about reinventing organizations — and then convinced a 60-year-old company to tear up its hierarchy.
Scientific papers take years to publish and months to peer-review — so a global team of researchers built a way to share them immediately.
Fifty makers share one workshop — but marathon monthly meetings were killing the energy they came there to use.
850 teaching positions unfilled, a profession in crisis — and 28,000 union members who needed to debate strike action and reject government offers together.
500 active volunteers scattered across France, constant turnover, and over 2,000 events to coordinate — the movement can't afford to lose its institutional memory.
Sixty people scattered across the United States spent ten months turning passionate disagreements into a 40-page cooperative charter for protecting the earth.
A group of friends in Burlington want to open the city's first community-owned brewery — but first they have to make democratic decisions with investors who range from casual supporters to hands-on operators.
How do you measure something as vast as a country's human rights performance — and get diverse experts worldwide to agree on the method?
A small lending society in Cornwall funds grassroots renewable energy projects — but reviewing each loan used to eat up entire meetings.
Twenty people pool their money every month to invest in local co-ops — but going around the circle to allocate funds used to take an hour.
When Bath lost its charity support agency, a handful of volunteers built one from scratch — no building, no budget, no government backing.
A workers' co-op that teaches other co-ops how to be democratic had to figure out how to practice what it preached — with a team scattered across the UK.
When a software company put salary transparency to an anonymous vote, the CEO had reservations — but the team was unanimous, and it exposed a pay gap they could finally fix.
A national workforce capability framework on family and sexual violence was shaped through careful online consultation that drew meaningful, detailed feedback from across the sector.
A globally distributed space industry cooperative found that Loomio replaced scattered Slack and email threads with focused discussions that actually produce outcomes.
In the middle of a political crisis, a distributed network of Venezuelan citizens needed new tools to organize — fast, safely, and from wherever they were.
A five-person web design cooperative stopped dreading their governance meetings by moving discussions and voting online.
A strategic planning consultant who spent 21 years in foster care now uses online collaboration to ensure every stakeholder is heard.
A climate action group in a small New Zealand town couldn't wait a month between meetings to act on new ideas — so they started prototyping between sessions.
A network of cooperative researchers across five countries can never all meet face to face — so they run a general meeting that never adjourns.
A 75-year-old tech university discovered that its smartest people do their best thinking outside of meetings.
A nine-member dog walking cooperative in New York uses translation and photo sharing to collaborate across English and Spanish.
A Welsh parliamentary committee turned a one-off citizen meeting into an ongoing dialogue that made both sessions more productive.
A commons-oriented translation collective coordinates publishers in four countries to print the same book locally — without any of the restrictions of the traditional publishing world.
A national government agency replaced the traditional submissions process with open online dialogue, engaging senior IT leaders who would never have participated otherwise.
A citizen activism group stopped losing decisions to email threads and started resolving them between meetings with clear deadlines and modifiable proposals.
A coworking space in Lille discovered that engaging with disagreement — not just counting votes — unlocks better decisions and deeper shared understanding.
A global network of open-source researchers could collaborate on wikis and blogs all day — but when it came to collective decisions, they kept going in circles.
A co-living hotel in San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury uses collaborative decision-making to run a dynamic community of residents, guests, and neighbors.
An international collective moved from Facebook and email to real decision-making — and members who had gone quiet suddenly started contributing again.
Five constantly travelling social media consultants found a way to make real decisions together without ever being in the same room.
When Hungary's government proposed education cuts, student activists didn't just protest — they translated Loomio into Hungarian and organized a nationwide democratic movement that forced the government to back down.
A coalition of direct democracy groups launched hundreds of local decision-making groups covering every region of Greece, turning online discussion into pressure for real political change.
Five busy trustees scattered across the city needed to approve loans fast — but couldn't get in the same room. They haven't needed to since.
Get stories of collaborative decision-making delivered to your inbox.