Conditions for Whitelisting Reviewers
Loie Mon 17 Dec 2018 3:09PMPublicSeen by 158Lindsay and I talked about a couple things to improve the Milestone Reviewers flow a month or so back, and I want to bring this here just to get approval. .
Tension:
We have more users hopping onto the platform and therefore need to eliminate easy points of newbie failure like ending up with a dud reviewer.
It will be a great help when we have someone dedicated to gatekeeping the reviewers list, but I don't know who that is yet. :thinking:
See the proposal for all that we can decide on now!
Half Life for Reviewers
proposal by Loie Closed Mon 24 Dec 2018 3:02PM
There is a half-life on each reviewer’s existence on the whitelist.
We suggest that after 6 months people are automatically removed and if they wish to continue it will be super easy to add them back on. I don’t know if there’s any way to automate the half-life to be conditional to their activity as a reviewer, but that would be awesome. Even if it doesn’t make sense to automate the half-life in the DApp, we could just have an agreement that every 6 months reviewers are cleared out if they aren’t active.
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 4 | 50 | 20 |  | |
| Abstain | 3 | 38 | 15 |   | |
| Disagree | 1 | 13 | 5 |  | |
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 12 | 60 |       |
8 of 20 votes cast (40% participation)
Bowen Sanders
Mon 17 Dec 2018 10:21PM
We just need to make sure that if we off-board someone, we bring someone on :)
Kay
Tue 18 Dec 2018 12:54AM
Would like to find a better mechanic to remove reviewers than auto-remove. Are there any other options on the table? Can we build an oracle around this that tracks reviewer activity?
DaniTue 18 Dec 2018 2:40PM
I like where we're going with this and there are some assumptions to check. Will it really be super easy to add someone back in? Shouldn't we give Reviewers the ability to opt in before they are removed? What happens to pending milestones when someone is removed, this feels like there's a big risk of messing up someones time-critical approval process in the future. It could be a lot easier to have an accountability for maintaining the list first to develop a process.
Don AdamsTue 18 Dec 2018 6:55PM
This would very cool as an optional feature that is available to all campaigns
Griff GreenThu 20 Dec 2018 5:37PM
needs a more solid proposal
Kris is
Thu 20 Dec 2018 5:37PM
don't think this needs to be automated - prob easier to see if the people still are ok to do this. no need to automate everything :)
Pre-whitelisting interrogation
proposal by Loie Closed Sun 23 Dec 2018 3:02PM
They are sent these req's and confirm them before being added:
"Being added to the reviewers list on the Dapp requires 3 things:
- You have made a milestone before and completed it to “Paid”.
- You have familiarized yourself with the Milestone Tutorial and understand how to check a milestone for all the necessary parts, and which errors are “blocking”.
- You have enough time to review all the milestones proposed to you quickly (within one week of them being proposed) so that people can be paid efficiently. “Milestone Reviewer” is documented in your roles on the Roles Sheet. "
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 7 | 88 | 37 | | |
| Abstain | 1 | 13 | 5 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 11 | 58 | |
8 of 19 votes cast (42% participation)
DaniTue 18 Dec 2018 3:01PM
I think those are 4 bullet points above, the last sentence about Roles is separate from the time commitment. this is a great process addition - as part of the Role documentation, a responsibility could be added to notify the Whitelist administrator when unavailable to review for any reason.
Don AdamsTue 18 Dec 2018 6:53PM
Maybe a stupid question: does "understand[ing]... which errors are 'blocking'" mean that someone would need to have a semi-solid technical background in order to be a milestone reviewer?