Adding urease inhibitors to Overseer
This discussion thread has been created to discuss the attached plan for adding urease inhibitors to Overseer.
We have invited experts or companies known to be involved in the supply of urease inhibitors, or have undertaken research or have expertise in the use of urease inhibitors (the group). Please advise of additional people who should be part of this group.
We are asking that you review this plan and add any comments to this discussion, particularly any that relate to errors or additional information that would materially change the implementation. Others in the group can see these comments and additional responses added so that a consensus is arrived before voting on the plan.
If you are not an invited reviewer but have comments that may materially affect the implementation plan, please leave a comment.
Once you are ready to vote please review the proposal on the right of this discussion and vote accordingly.
Poll Created Thu 18 Oct 2018 8:09PM
The proposed plan for adding urease inhibitors is acceptable Closed Fri 2 Nov 2018 4:02AM
We ask that you vote on whether the implementation plan, as outlined in the implementation section of the attached document, is acceptable for inclusion in Overseer.
If the majority find it acceptable, the implementation plan will be actioned, taking into account any comments made. If the majority find it unacceptable, the implementation plan will be re-worked based on comments received.
Note that additional questions are highlighted within each section of the document, in summary we are asking for the following:
• That the way products are proposed to be entered into the software is sensible and understandable in relation to practical management activities
• Confirm that given the research findings it is acceptable to set the effectiveness of urea treated with nBTPT at a rate of 250 ppm or more as 0.45
• Confirm that given the previous research scope and lack of supporting data, it is not possible to implement a site-specific approach
• To identify if there are any errors or additional information that would materially change the
|Results||Option||% of points||Voters|
|Undecided||0%||8||GR AW AM NM|
3 of 11 people have voted (27%)
Sun 28 Oct 2018 8:33PM
I agree with the proposal. The planned implementation is consistent with the current inventory methodology. The inventory also makes use of the same research that is referenced in the methodology research.