Division of work

What about a common testprotocol, something (stylesheet?) that contains the features in the CC proposal so that we can evaluate each feature for each tool with a number and with comments or whatever so that we easily can share and better compare our examines.

We agreed before to use Loomio threads for the reviews, but I suppose it would be good to have a stylesheet next to it to collate results; would you like to create one?

Mats - thats a good idea. I've been creating a template with section headers for the wiki I'm writing this up in... would be good if you suggest a short list of headers?

I suggest we start with text descriptions (to capture a richer feedback), and move towards a tabular form?

Ah - just seen the spreadsheet - that's great thanks!

You can use only the text-related cells if you wich.

My template is already uploaded

yes thank you for starting it!

I have an opinion. It is very loud and just like Milton Friedman makes everybody look stupid who doesn't agree. Is it democracy if you fall for my demagogy? :hugging: How are emojis meant to bring fact-orientedness to this debate? :wrestlers_tone5:

Does the Google Tag Services thing serve any political purpose, or is it just here to let the NSA know what is being debated?

So far, it seems we have the following people testing the following platforms: @sergioarbarviro Nova Ideo; @lynx Liquid Feedback; @ristoalakaila Loomio. Who would like to review which other platform? I could review Discourse.

Maestro conference I guess was mentioned in the meeting 18/2, unless someone has insights and know it's no use checking it out, I can go for it.