Aim 2: We aim to challenge organizations like IATEFL to abandon their elitism in favor of a more bottom-up orientation
we aim to challenge organizations like IATEFL to abandon their elitism in favor of a more bottom-up orientation
proposal by Paul Walsh Closed Wed 3 Jun 2015 12:07PM
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Abstain | 4 | 50 | 44 |
|
|
| Disagree | 4 | 50 | 44 |
|
|
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 1 | 11 |
|
8 of 9 votes cast (88% participation)
Paul Walsh
Sun 31 May 2015 2:17PM
I agree in general with the proposal - but think that by building a strong grassroots we will challenge organisations like this.
We don't need direct confrontation - at least not anymore. People know who we are.
Helen Waldron
Sun 31 May 2015 2:24PM
Bloody hell, this site is complicated.
I think negative aims are a waste of time and energy.
Bill Templer
Sun 31 May 2015 3:28PM
I would rephrase the statement in ways I have suggested
Helen Waldron
Sun 31 May 2015 3:49PM
I think negative aims are a waste of time and energy.
Laura Adele Soracco
Sun 31 May 2015 6:37PM
I'm not sure targeting IATEFL directly is a good use of our time.
Rosemere Damasio Bard
Tue 2 Jun 2015 1:19PM
I agree that it sounds negative and does not help to engage in dialogue with the various organisations.
Theresa Gorman
Tue 2 Jun 2015 2:11PM
As you all have said, our energy should go toward nurturing grassroots, horizontal movements instead of confronting IATEFL. We could re-word this idea the way Bill has suggested, just by way of saying how this group is distinct from other groups.
Paul Walsh Sun 31 May 2015 2:26PM
Hi Helen,
Sorry! How is it complicated? You should just be able to sign in with Google.
Is it the voting procedure?
paul
Paul Walsh · Sun 31 May 2015 1:42PM
I think this is a good aim - but we risk dissipating our energy in confronting organisations.
But just by building strong grassroots organisations - this is already a challenge.