Loomio

Quest for the Holy Name

João Azevedo PatrícioJoão Azevedo Patrício Mon 22 Apr 2013 1:17PMPublicSeen by 280
João Azevedo Patrício

Procedures for Name Achievment

proposal by João Azevedo Patrício Closed Thu 25 Apr 2013 2:10PM

  1. (Re)Start pulbic contribution to List and clear it from problematic names (5 days)
  2. Vote (OMA Members + Active Contributors to OMA Cooker)
  3. Apply some statistic rule and select the most voted (from 3 to 7 maximum)
  4. Discuss and take final selection of name in extraordinary council meeting [invite for discussion the TC and the team leaders (if not in council)].

Results

ResultsOptionVotes% of votes cast% of eligible voters
Agree99014Raphaël JadotjclvanierKate LebedeffmdawkinsAlexander KhryukinVladimir RubanovJoão Azevedo PatrícioColin Closerugyada
Abstain000 
Disagree1102Anurag Bhandari
Block000 
Undecided5685John CaveWayne SalleeCharles SchulzBernhard RosenkränzerLeonardo MeloAndrey BondrovGuilherme MoroModise MakhethaBen BullardRobert XuChris TannerjdronovaDiogo TravassosLeonardo Silveira CoelhoRaul Liota da RosaMarco Antonio BenattoAlisson Oliveira FerreiraJhonatan Piffer SiqueiraTomasz Paweł GajcPaulo César Pereira de Andrade

10 of 66 votes cast (15% participation)

João Azevedo Patrício

João Azevedo Patrício
Agree
Mon 22 Apr 2013 3:39PM

I agree with the procedure. The final choice must, like in Get a Face!, respect at maximum the voting. Only higher concerns should "block" some names.

Kate Lebedeff

Kate Lebedeff
Agree
Mon 22 Apr 2013 6:24PM

sounds good:)

Colin Close

Colin Close
Agree
Tue 23 Apr 2013 10:46PM

This needs to get done fast!!!

Anurag Bhandari

Anurag Bhandari
Disagree
Wed 24 Apr 2013 12:25AM

I'm against such lengthy processes. We are already way behind schedule. I've already vocally put my arguments on MLs. It should be (1) public voting and (2) Council+TC discussion & voting. Period.

Colin Close

Colin CloseTue 23 Apr 2013 10:45PM

One note. Should we also include in 2 anyone who contributed a name? Only one vote though irrespective, of the number of names contributed.

Anurag Bhandari

Anurag BhandariWed 24 Apr 2013 12:26AM

And I feel we should allot a max of 3-5 days to get this done fully.

João Azevedo Patrício

João Azevedo PatrícioWed 24 Apr 2013 9:00AM

Hi Anurag, This will be fast, I'm trying to get the list for the voting to do it Sunday/Monday and if I get it on time, agenda the meeting for final discussion for Wednesday and a name on Wednesday night.

Guilherme Moro

Guilherme MoroWed 24 Apr 2013 9:38AM

The timing is still not well define, what are the plans?
From the moment we open a vote for the members how long they will have? Keep in mind that some members that want to vote can't participate in a vote called just couple of days before and closing 1 day after.

João Azevedo Patrício

João Azevedo PatrícioWed 24 Apr 2013 1:30PM

Guilherme I was thinking of 48h (from Monday 8:am UTC) But warning of the voting Saturday (48 hours) before. I just need the mails from people. if I have the lists, I can schedule everything, no list is impossible to do it.

Load More