Loomio

Clarify constitution to make clear that membership of CoTech requires membership of workers.coop

Chris Lowis (Go Free Range)Chris Lowis (Go Free Range) Thu 24 Jul 2025 4:01PMPublicSeen by 79

I propose changing the following section of the CoTech constitution

Who is eligible to join?

There is no fee to join CoTech, but, in order to be eligible, your co-operative must:

  • agree with and practise the 7 Co-operative Principles,

  • be owned and democratically run by its workers,

  • provide tech/digital services.

  • be based in or have significant ties to the UK

Your membership is approved by the existing members of CoTech via a proposal on Loomio.

To read:

Who is eligible to join?

There is no fee to join CoTech, but, in order to be eligible, your co-operative must:

  • agree with and practise the 7 Co-operative Principles,

  • be a member of workers.coop,

  • provide tech/digital services.

  • be based in or have significant ties to the UK

Your membership is approved by the existing members of CoTech via a proposal on Loomio.

(significant change highlighted).

I believe this is in line with our decision to "become an industry circle of workers.coop" that was passed in March 2023.

The advantage of doing this is that it means that we don't have to discuss/decide what "owned and democratically run by its workers" means, as we are doing in the ongoing decision to accept Kin into CoTech. We can instead delegate that decision to workers.coop.

In practice membership of CoTech entitles the co-op to participate in votes like this one, and have their name listed on the CoTech website. Other benefits of CoTech membership, primarily networking opportunities at the gathering and online at community.coops.tech and available to any organisation or individual we decide to invite along. We frequently involve like-minded folks at our gatherings, for example.

I'll leave this thread open for any questions. I intend to put it to a proposal in a few days time if that goes ok.

Natasha Natarajan

Natasha NatarajanThu 24 Jul 2025 4:04PM

I think this is a really good idea. Thanks for proposing Chris.

Lucinda Broadbent

Lucinda BroadbentThu 24 Jul 2025 6:11PM

me too, thanks Chris, good thinking. I'd vote yes

Graham

GrahamFri 25 Jul 2025 8:13AM

Problem resolved. Thank you Chris.

James Mead (Go Free Range)

James Mead (Go Free Range)Fri 25 Jul 2025 8:58AM

Good idea, Chris!

Chris Lowis (Go Free Range)

Change constitution to make clear that membership of CoTech requires membership of workers.coop

proposal by Chris Lowis (Go Free Range) Closed Mon 4 Aug 2025 2:00PM

Outcome
by Chris Lowis (Go Free Range) Tue 5 Aug 2025 8:11AM

The proposal to amend the constitution passed. I've updated the constitution as proposed. Thanks everyone!

I propose changing the following section of the CoTech constitution

Who is eligible to join?

There is no fee to join CoTech, but, in order to be eligible, your co-operative must:

  • agree with and practise the 7 Co-operative Principles,

  • be owned and democratically run by its workers,

  • provide tech/digital services.

  • be based in or have significant ties to the UK

Your membership is approved by the existing members of CoTech via a proposal on Loomio.

To read:

Who is eligible to join?

There is no fee to join CoTech, but, in order to be eligible, your co-operative must:

  • agree with and practise the 7 Co-operative Principles,

  • be a member of workers.coop,

  • provide tech/digital services.

  • be based in or have significant ties to the UK

Your membership is approved by the existing members of CoTech via a proposal on Loomio.

(significant change highlighted).

I believe this is in line with our decision to "become an industry circle of workers.coop" that was passed in March 2023.

The advantage of doing this is that it means that we don't have to discuss/decide what "owned and democratically run by its workers" means, as we are doing in the ongoing decision to accept Kin into CoTech. We can instead delegate that decision to workers.coop.

Changes to the constitution are a "member decision" as per the constitution, so if you're voting please make clear which CoTech member co-op you're voting on behalf of. Thank you!

Results

ResultsOptionVotes% of votes cast% of eligible voters
Agree101006GrahamChris Croome (Webarchitects Co-operative)Mariano MareyChris Lowis (Go Free Range)Liam MacLeod (MediaBlaze Hosts)Lucinda BroadbentDavid CarpenterEmmy LeadleyShaun FensomMel Hayes
Abstain000 
Disagree000 
Block000 
Undecided15194Josef Davies-CoatesJohn AthertonThomas DavisonSion Whellens (Principle Six)Ed RussellIan SnaithMark Simmonds  (Co-op Culture)Matthew ParsonsHarry "Outlandish" RobbinsSam GluckAbigail MurphyRasmus WinterMateus "Outlandish"MariaMatt KendonKaren BealJack ThorpA waterhouseConstance LaisnéJason Chrysostomou

10 of 161 votes cast (6% participation)

Chris Lowis (Go Free Range)

Chris Lowis (Go Free Range)
Agree
Mon 28 Jul 2025 2:04PM

Voting on behalf of Go Free Range. We think this change makes things clearer and simpler. The discussion about what a "worker co-op" is or isn't is one that's better handled by the broader membership of workers.coop.

Shaun Fensom

Shaun Fensom
Agree
Mon 28 Jul 2025 2:04PM

Makes total sense. For CBN

Liam MacLeod (MediaBlaze Hosts)

Liam MacLeod (MediaBlaze Hosts)
Agree
Mon 28 Jul 2025 2:04PM

Agreed

Simon Grant

Simon GrantTue 29 Jul 2025 7:45AM

I'm not in a position to vote, but this makes perfect sense to me. Thanks!

Ben Philp

Ben PhilpTue 29 Jul 2025 2:57PM

Good idea!

Load More