suneeshWed 18 Feb 2015 7:28AM
Check now., Forgot to add library for that. Thanks for remembering
suneeshWed 18 Feb 2015 7:46AM
source code is here https://github.com/uhsense/pirates
AkshayThu 19 Feb 2015 1:13AM
Will this replace the current template?
Pirate PraveenThu 19 Feb 2015 2:50AM
@akshay if everyone feels this is better, we'll replace the current site. What do you think about the new template?
AkshayThu 19 Feb 2015 2:59AM
Well, this is single page, more responsive, removes that girl's photo :P, has a darker background, and a less empty feel
Switch to Suneesh's layout
proposal by Akshay Closed Mon 2 Mar 2015 2:34PM
I added GPL wrongly in the proposal description. The template actually has a restrictive license http://pixelarity.com/license (for example it is prohibited to "Use, reproduction or display of the Template in a fashion that we consider as, or under applicable law is considered, [...] immoral, infringing, defamatory or libelous" )
We cannot be sure of what they consider infringing or libelous. Therefore, I retract this proposal.
Suneesh has made a responsive single page website for pirates.org.in (demo at http://piratesmov.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ ) It's licensed under GPL.
Adopt it.
If disagreeing, please tell what you find not acceptable, and possible fixes.
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 3 | 100 | 16 |   | |
| Abstain | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 16 | 84 |             |
3 of 19 votes cast (15% participation)
Pirate Praveen
Sat 28 Feb 2015 2:19AM
Yes, responsive and better presentation
Raju DevidasMon 2 Mar 2015 9:32AM
A lot better than the previous one.
suneeshMon 2 Mar 2015 9:56AM
There is an issue with license., The actual license of this template is http://pixelarity.com/license, and GPL is added by me (sorry, used to add GPL all the time. my mistake)., and i don't have any idea about licensing. is that a problem.?
Balasankar C ·Wed 18 Feb 2015 1:16AM
I haven't checked the source as I viewed it from mobile.. So pardon if I'm wrong.
I would suggest using a mobile-first framework like Bootstrap as currently that page does not looking good in mobile. See attachment.