CPWG Meeting Management
Seems as though we're already running out of time and we could use more interactivity on the, albeit large, calls. This is just a place to share thoughts and make proposals.
Sebastien Bachollet Tue 12 May 2020 8:45AM
Please NO. You have people who are more writer than speaker and the other way around. I realy prefer to talk but the tools (like this one) obliged me to write. Too much...
Jonathan Zuck Tue 12 May 2020 10:12AM
That makes sense but how do we keep people from babbling on too long or saying exactly the same thing as the person before them. We need to. do some training perhaps.
Sebastien Bachollet Tue 12 May 2020 10:58AM
I suggest 2 things
Use a 2’ timer for all
Ask the usual suspects to be exemplary
Nadira AL-Araj Wed 13 May 2020 6:32AM
Another way, at the beginning of the meeting to remind the participants that no need to take the mic if the discussion point was raised by any other participants.
Some participants think that talking in the session gives indication that they are active. Maybe to assure to the participants that getting and contributing into drafting team what makes an active participant.
Jonathan Zuck Wed 13 May 2020 8:22AM
Good idea. Perhaps this is a good reason to use polling so people feel engaged but don't feel the need to make repetitive interventions
Justine C. Wed 13 May 2020 11:26PM
Perhaps folks can post +1's in chat in agreement; we really should limit use of polls to answering a proposed position or question.
Jonathan Zuck Sat 16 May 2020 1:33AM
Why do you say that @Justine C. ? Isn't a poll quicker than counting +1s in that chat?
Justine C. Sun 17 May 2020 2:27AM
Depends.
Polls are better for yes or no questions. And if staff need to prep for polls in advance, then how to use polls in relation to comments coming in on the fly?
I feel too many polls are disruptive and folks may get lost in terms of timing - so polling during a call may be problematic.
Jonathan Zuck Sun 17 May 2020 2:51AM
Well, it's all an experiment but polls can be yes no, multiple choice, multiple choices. That covers a lot of ground. You're trying to get feedback on language and I thi K that's REALLY rough. Multiple languages, etc. People presenting to the CPWG need to
have thought questions, I think. Which of these are priorities? Which of these two things is more important, etc. Most aren't really capable of suggesting better language. Just my thoughts on a Saturday evening
Jonathan Zuck
Executive Director
Innovators Network Foundation
www.InnovatorsNetwork.org ( http://www.InnovatorsNetwork.org )
Nadira AL-Araj · Sat 9 May 2020 6:47PM
Agree, particularly to those on the audio bridge but as much as possible to encourage comments/questions on the chat that would be good