2014.1 codename
Raphaël Jadot Tue 9 Sep 2014 4:33PMPublicSeen by 326Hello,
OpenMandriva 2014.1 is about to be out. It is just a bugfix release, so it doesn't really enter in one of these categories:
https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Codename
If no reaction, this should simply keep the codename Phosphorus. Maybe some would prefer something à la MacOS X (like they did with Leopard and Snow Leopard), could be "Glowing Phosphorus" :)
Or something else?
Raphaël JadotTue 9 Sep 2014 4:57PM
Like it :)
Kate LebedeffTue 9 Sep 2014 5:46PM
both glowing phosphorus and phosphorescence sound nice:)
Anurag BhandariTue 9 Sep 2014 7:42PM
Why not! Or even Burning Phosphorous. Burning = bleeding edge / up-to-date.
Wayne SalleeTue 9 Sep 2014 9:32PM
I like Phosphorus.
Wayne Sallee
Wayne@WayneSallee.com
Davide GarattiWed 10 Sep 2014 5:40AM
Phosphorous is OK
Raphaël JadotWed 10 Sep 2014 8:04AM
@waynesallee you think it's better keeping the same codename as for 2014?
Wayne SalleeWed 10 Sep 2014 1:40PM
@raphaeljadot
Ok, now I see that I missed the point. The question is "do we want to use the same code name for two different releases in 2014?"
Yea, adding an additional description to the code name would probably be a good Idea.
Another thought, what about "Phosphorus Glowing"?
Wayne Sallee
Wayne@WayneSallee.com
Wayne SalleeWed 10 Sep 2014 1:48PM
Or "Phosphorus Burning".
The idea is do we want the year code name as the first name or second name?
Wayne Sallee
Wayne@WayneSallee.com
Wayne SalleeWed 10 Sep 2014 1:53PM
I would think that if we were to have 3 releases, then use "glowing" for second release, and "burning" for third release, but since there will not be any third release, I think "burning" is good for second release.
Wayne Sallee
Wayne@WayneSallee.com
João Azevedo Patrício ·Tue 9 Sep 2014 4:37PM
I like that idea. Maybe also we could not do like Apple, and just use a principle of the element, like: Glowing Phosphorus principle is "Phosphorescence" :-)