TOU For Pictures
Do not modify the Terms Of Use for pictures to add compliance for WHO Code.
Last year we discussed modifying the TOU for pictures to add a condition for who compliance (no logo, no bottlefeeding). We discussed that it didn't feel right to exclude bottlefeeding mothers because a lot of babies that receive donated milk cannot breastfeed, and if we do not allow non compliant companies we have to edit the stash pics significantly, and don't showcase pictures with sns. So the proposal is to not add a condition for who compliance.
TOU for Pictures
proposal by Agustina Vidal Closed Sun 17 Mar 2013 8:03PM
Do not modify the TOU for pictures to add compliance for WHO Code.
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 9 | 90 | 82 |  | |
| Abstain | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 1 | 10 | 9 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 1 | 9 |
10 of 11 votes cast (90% participation)
Emily Danielson Reyes
Tue 12 Mar 2013 3:57PM
Victoria GensheimerWed 13 Mar 2013 7:22AM
Stephanie BenelliWed 13 Mar 2013 4:56PM
I whole-heartedly agree. Censoring milksharing families is not in the best interest of WMW. I do think we can raise awareness of WHO code without modifying the TOU (maybe one of our theme days?).
Dinnae GallowayThu 14 Mar 2013 11:55PM
i personally feel that we should leave it as is, but ensure that in MULTIPLE SPOTS in our literature, website, social media, that it says that we do NOT endorse the companies in the pictures, and give a link to a page w/ WHO code compliant companies.
Bethany HoeflichFri 15 Mar 2013 11:29PM
I agree. We aren't marketing anything and so we aren't bound by the WHO code. Censoring pictures is absolutely not okay with me, as it will only further alienate families that bottlefeed donor milk.
Leah Callahan
Sat 16 Mar 2013 5:11PM
Based on how Loomio is describing agree/abstain/disagree, I'm in the "disagree" camp. I think we can do better but I don't have an alternative proposal at this time. I will keep thinking about this and may introduce a new proposal in the future.
Agustina VidalMon 11 Mar 2013 8:06PM
Terms of use
Dinnae GallowayTue 12 Mar 2013 6:29AM
so this proposal is that we LEAVE the TOU as is - so no who compliance addition? (i thought we HAD added it in last year, but i guess not, eh? ;P )
henny zainal ·Mon 11 Mar 2013 5:45PM
Tou?