Setting the Date for the 2026 Joint Sprint
Joana Thu 4 Dec 2025 10:14AMPublicSeen by 7OGC, OSGeo and the Apache Software Foundation have been
running Joint Code Sprints yearly, since 2021.OGC has proposed three dates for 2026 and it would be good to identify which one is the preferred option for OSGeo. Since the Q1 date is approaching soon, this decision should be made asap.
An email was sent to the TOSprint mailing list, to gather feedback from the community: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2025-November/thread.html#799
Both OGC and ASF agree with the Q1 date.Choose the preferred date for the 2026 Joint Code Sprint
poll by Joana Closed Thu 4 Dec 2025 10:23AM
What is this poll about?
Setting the date for the 2026 Joint Sprint
Why is this important?
The Q1 date is approaching soon
What are you asking people to do?
Choose a date
Choose the option(s) you favor.
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Q3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Any | 0 | 0 | ||
| None | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 9 |     |
0 of 9 votes cast (0% participation)
Choose the preferred date for the 2026 Joint Code Sprint
poll by Joana Closed Tue 9 Dec 2025 9:00AM
Outcome
It seems that the Q1 date was the one that collected more support.
What is this poll about?
Setting the date for the 2026 Joint Sprint
Why is this important?
The Q1 date is approaching soon
What are you asking people to do?
Choose a date
Choose the option(s) you favor.
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 50 | 3 | | |||
| Any | 50 | 3 | | |||
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Q3 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| None | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Undecided | 3 | |
6 of 9 votes cast (66% participation)
Motion to approve 2026 Q1 dates (January 27 to 29) for the OGC/ASF/OSGeo Joint Sprint 2026.
proposal by Angelos Tzotsos Closed Wed 10 Dec 2025 7:26AM
Outcome
Motion passed
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 8 | 89 | 89 | | |
| Abstain | 1 | 11 | 11 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 0 | 0 |
9 of 9 votes cast (100% participation)
Jeroen Ticheler ·Tue 9 Dec 2025 9:53AM
No problem! I think both Vicky and my votes were lost due to a change of the initial proposal. But I'm happy with you proceeding with Q1 since that is what OGC and ASF also aim for.