Membership applications
Currently we have all applications routed to [email protected]
At the same time we have a membership committee, which is taking care of memberships and membership data.
At the same time we received a number of concerns from members-to-be about supplying their private data to a wide ML (as council ML).
what is clear:
1. members concerns have to be respected
2. council members have to have access to this data if needed (and they guarantee, that this data goes no further)
3. safe encrypted storage of data within membership committee has to be guaranteed
Suggestion: to make sure that membership committee ML is fully closed and to make it primary email for membership applications.
To announce this change and the above reasoning on the relevant wiki page
Poll Created Mon 11 Nov 2013 7:51PM
Do you agree to route applications to fully closed membership committee ML and implement changes as suggested in the text above? Closed Thu 14 Nov 2013 7:55PM
Results
Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 95.2% | 20 | |
Abstain | 4.8% | 1 | ||
Disagree | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Undecided | 0% | 45 |
21 of 66 people have participated (31%)
John Cave
Tue 12 Nov 2013 7:09AM
Yes, but it should also be between membership committee and the team leader, particularly for teams like Infra where there is data at stake :)
Raphaël Jadot
Wed 13 Nov 2013 8:49AM
Maybe we should OpenPGP certificate for membership list.
Tomasz Paweł Gajc
Thu 14 Nov 2013 8:06AM
Seems to be fair.
jclvanier · Wed 13 Nov 2013 4:16PM
@Raphaël: could you be more specific?