#WeHaveSpace Action Day 23rd of May Analysis
What went well and what went not so well on the #WeHaveSpace Action Day?
This thread starts with the input given at the Action Day Analysis call.
Please post only one thing per comment. If a similar comment already exists add your point as a subcomment.
FranziskaSat 30 May 2020 3:14PM
GOOD: through the atteempt of planning an action day: closer contact to other chapters
FranziskaSat 30 May 2020 3:11PM
NOT SO GOOD in many chapters little capacity
FranziskaSat 30 May 2020 3:08PM
NOT SO GOOD Not much time for preparation
FranziskaSat 30 May 2020 3:07PM
GOOD: people, already following the EMA pages became active and more interested
Press webinar(s)
proposal by Hans Closed Sat 30 May 2020 3:01PM
We will organize at least one webinar for basic press work for everyone as soon as possible.
A webinar for everyone to learn the 101 of press work.
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undecided | 1 | 100 |
0 of 1 votes cast (0% participation)
HansSat 30 May 2020 10:42AM
GOOD: short-term activity of ngos
35 ngos took part in the Action Day and shared our event with only 2 days notice.
HansSat 30 May 2020 9:35AM
NOT SO GOOD: Not a lot of media attention
We did not hear of any media outlet who took our Action Day up.
HansSat 30 May 2020 9:29AM
GOOD: Activity of city chapters
About 25 city chapters all over Europe took part in the Action Day in various creative ways. New interest in forming city chapters and being active in existing city chapters was sparked.
Hans ·Mon 1 Jun 2020 1:55PM
We also had interest of new chapters. We have now our first ones in Luxembourg and Sweden.