Loomio
Thu 23 Oct 2014 11:54PM

Require a TLDR summary if comment is too long

AI Alanna Irving Public Seen by 99

TL;DR: If you type a long comment, Loomio should ask you to write a short summary, which is then posted at the top with the rest of the comment under a "show more" link. This will leave space for those who want to engage in long-form discussion, while also keeping the conversation accessible to those who don't want to, don't have time, or can't.


Show More:

I'm a big fan of long-form communication (books! woo!) and I also think there's an important role for very in-depth discussion in writing on the internet. There are a lot of ideas you just cannot communicate properly in a tweet or soundbite.

However, when a conversation on Loomio involves a lot of very long comments and walls of text, it can be excluding to new people coming into the discussion, people with limited time, people who have trouble reading, etc. Our main goal is about facilitating participation from all voices, so this is a concern.

Long comments can also hijack the discussion, being dominated by a small number of people interested in that communication style or some specific aspect of a wider discussion. This can leave everyone else out, and make it hard to bring the conversation back to a point or move toward decision/action.

I was thinking about how to create space for the best of both worlds, and I started thinking about TL;DR. I often put them at the top of long-form emails or Loomios so that if someone only has time to read one sentence, at least they get that important summary.

Here's my feature idea: if you type a comment over a certain length, a box pops up asking you to write a short summary of your point. That is posted at the top, and then there's a link to "show more" to see the rest of your comment. Kind of like a statement of position (which Loomio asks for on votes) but for comments.

This would mean that someone could scan just these "headlines" and still participate, while also leaving space for those who want to engage in long-form discussion.

JK

James Kiesel Fri 24 Oct 2014 12:02AM

Definitely don't require it. The last thing I want to see after typing a diatribe is 'We couldn't submit your comment because you didn't do this fiddly thing.' Could be good if it's clear and optional.

AI

Alanna Irving Fri 24 Oct 2014 12:13AM

OK so if you type a long comment and there's no TLDR, should it just take the first 4 lines and then hide the rest under "show more"? I think that would encourage people to be concise :)

JK

James Kiesel Fri 24 Oct 2014 12:23AM

Yeah totally. Character count would probably be more practical than lines, but all for encouraging brevity.

JK

Joop Kiefte (LaPingvino) Sun 26 Oct 2014 10:37AM

You could easily do both: "Because your comment is too long, you will need to provide a tldr. We put the beginning of your comment as such for now, feel free to make it better."

S

Simon Tue 28 Oct 2014 1:31AM

I really like the idea of the author being asked to write an 'executive summary' of a long post because readers 'read' different messages from the same piece of text.

How many characters/words should be allowed before a post is considered 'long'?

AI

Alanna Irving Tue 28 Oct 2014 4:52AM

I would say something like 200 characters.

I am not saying that there shouldn't be comments longer than this. I'm saying that if people can summarise the main point in something around that length, followed by further detail, then the discussion as a whole is accessible to more people.

PC

Patrick Cotter Thu 30 Oct 2014 2:08AM

  • First time user here
  • I agree because attention spans are getting much shorter
  • People read bullet points
DU

Jean-Daniel Cusin Thu 13 Nov 2014 5:09PM

Some people like to "talk/type" their ideas out - they become fully formed only at the end. Having a synopsis field asking the user to summarize can go a long way to enhance the quality of the discussion.

Another aspect is hiding the characters over and above 200 char. I think that is good. Otherwise one has to scroll umpteen times to see the latest.

BB

Ben Burton Tue 18 Nov 2014 11:17PM

I would guess that over time people learn that if they aren't concise, their points in a discussion get overlooked and have less influence.

That said, I would be interested in knowing if a suggested limit (like 200 characters) with a link to "show more" gets clicked open very often. Those metrics would be useful in deciding how many characters to show and if to hide any characters at all.

AI

Alanna Irving Sun 23 Nov 2014 3:28AM

@BenBurton most people learn, but unfortunately it only takes one or two people not getting the point to really put others off participating in a discussion due to walls of text.

Load More