Principle of public ML moderators selection
To have a list of all members, asking council to vote for moderators of the general ML. The more people we have, the better.
Each vote can be given to many members.
Do we accept this offer?
Do we accept this idea of choosing the moderators?
proposal by Kate Lebedeff Closed Tue 2 Apr 2013 5:27PM
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 4 | 100 | 36 |   | |
| Abstain | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 7 | 64 |    |
4 of 11 votes cast (36% participation)
Raphaël Jadot
Sun 31 Mar 2013 9:30PM
At first glance it seems a good idea to me
Bernhard RosenkränzerSun 31 Mar 2013 11:14PM
Sounds like a good idea. May need some way to kick a moderator if he acts up though...
Kate LebedeffMon 1 Apr 2013 8:06AM
The moderator could be kicked at any point by the council, I think. Same way as elected. We can specify this.
Kate LebedeffTue 2 Apr 2013 8:01AM
to Wayne: but how and who appoints?:)
Wayne SalleeTue 2 Apr 2013 2:35PM
The council.
Wayne SalleeTue 2 Apr 2013 2:36PM
Or anyone that the council gives authority to appoint moderators.
Wayne Sallee ·Mon 1 Apr 2013 10:26PM
I don't think it should be necessary to elect moderators for ML. I think we can just appoint them.