Thematic Working Groups

Hi,

So, it seems we are going for the re-combination ;)

Zeljko: the idea of the leisure-sports together with food and (specially) health is very interesting. Did you sent already teh proposal and I missed it? Could you fill the form so we can have more details about this approach to send around? It would be great to have also an idea of who else would be up to join that discussion.

In fact, I think could be a good idea to send all the forms to everybody in each theme, so people would know who they are working with.

Nicole: I agree there might be a bit confising to split the workshops in two groups, maybe leading to a need to coordinate the coordinators. Maybe we could split in different tasks (pre-meeting documentation, general methodology and frame of the workshops, time-line of the process, etc.). I am out of Madrid and only partially available but I come back next week.

One last question: I don't know how fixed is the program schedule as drafted here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fFwlw6axcEuy-fyh1wxCBSBbd7Wb-BpGvpfa3wOhxjs/edit#gid=0. How finished do you see it? Is it still possible to add or modify elements?

Best.
Ana

Totally still possible to modify program elements. I am working now on trying to nail down the content - but need some help. One major change we are considering is to cancel the Friday joint session with TEF to free up more time for wrapping up the workshops and wikifying them. @fredericsultan is working on the proposal for this. I think trying to do them all in one day (thursday) is unrealistic so I am for this idea - curious to hear others' thoughts. Ana, do you want to schedule a time to talk soon more about this next week?

Your idea to split up the different components makes sense. And yes, we definitely should share the form responses, that was the idea!

I'm not sure if @zblace filled the form yet, but he def. should! We spoke the day before yesterday and I think he was not 100% sure if he is coming but considering it strongly.

@malashierbas thank you for expressing interest in addition of sport.

I semi-filled in the form just now (it is extensive and I will have to revise it), as I entered this group on a bit of a side-ways...as I applied to Transeuropa Festival
for participation in Commons theme which turned out to be ECA work. I was also applying for the City of Ghent to distributed trans-european pre-events "Transeuropa Open" (Oct 21st) https://transeuropafestival.eu/#toggle-id-8 to connect my art-residency work on queering/commoning sports/arts/making-culture at Timelab.org with Ghent Commons Festival (Oct27-29) and TransEuropa Festival.

Anyway I hope to come to Madrid bringing in experience/work of few organizations that worked so far with sport art/activism and want to develop concepts around commoning the fields of sport/recreation/leisure... My 2 sport colegues Caitlin (Berlin) and Tonci (Split ) will join me in Ghent and will come to Madrid via TransEuropa Festival (their application approved, me on waiting list).

I would include a workshop on the Internet commons in the city: community telecoms(guifinet), local management of data, .....using safe, free and open software, open access and open data policies.

I am not sure about joining housing and urbanism/public space. I think each deserves own space. Health and food is a good one.

Hello all, and good to see how far you've gotten already. I'm sorry we've been so busy and have been only been able to listen in since our group call a long way back.

As to the above discussion, I would also support a group on migration/refugee issues. Indeed, we will be running a workshop at TEF on how to build an Artists-at-Risk (AR) residency network - which involves a community commons:
https://transeuropafestival.eu/eventos/building-local-artists-risk/. Apparently this might be scheduled for Thursday morning or Friday.

Also at TEF, we are opening an exhibition with artists-at-risk called the AR Pavilion-Madrid at Matadero on Wednesday evening at 10 pm, I believe. (It would be great if there was no overlap with the ECA!)

By the way, is there a place where can one can read up on the proposed content of the different thematic groups?

Warm greetings,

Ivor

Hi,

I attach here the spreadsheet of the filled forms organized by the six proposed themes. There were four new people inscribed, also included.

Great. I had trouble opening it easily for some reason, so I copied the values into a new file here in case anyone has the same problem (exact same content). I added a bit of color/boundaries and a title so it's a bit more readable when we circulate the sheets to the people in the groups themselves - I wanted to do more to make it readable but everything seemed quite time consuming.

I'm writing a quick word of thanks to the participants now and explaining that there will be more by the end of the month on next steps. Ana is writing a draft of the concept for the workshops to share to the groups.

It would be good to collectively look these groups over.. who is missing that might possibly be able to participate? Are the groups diverse enough (especially in terms of having Spanish groups?)

We want to hold another call on this process next week: https://framadate.org/QR4wdhFyC7a5GJERKHMxiMo1/admin

We will discuss the concept and blocks for the workshops, try to organize an internal documentation team, and decide the steps for sending out the data forms and explaining next steps to participants (it'd be good to have some of these components prepared beforehand)

Hi. I copy here a possible description for the different themes that we can dicuss in detail on Monday. Refugees and migrants is missing, as there were not enough contributions to outline a compact description, and I have asked Gaelle if she could work on it.

Comments, contributions and clarifications wellcome :)

····························

Tools for democracy (techonology and participation)

This theme deals with civic participation the link between commons and democracy, the different ways to foster the involvement of citizens in the production of their cities through a public and civic engagement and development of direct political action. As these experiences, lately have been related to the use of technology and digital tools to enhance democratic processes, the proposed themes of “Participation of citizens to urban policies” and “Technology for citizens: decentralized and democratic” have been merged in order to allow the co-production of public policies and projects, including the question of the democratization of technology, the construction of digital rights and the understanding of knowledge as a commons.

The participants have expressed their interest in, among other things, how to promote the diversity and inclusiveness of digital communities, specially those based on open-source and copy-left culture, in the analysis of the changes produced by the new collaborative processes, in the cooperation of research and innovation with local citizen and the development of scientific mediation, and in the link between institutions and citizens, whether it be governmental, educational etc. and how those models of co-operation are shifting and becoming more democratic. They also have experience in the production of tools and resources such as online maps, collective storytelling and repositories of experiences, and experiences designed to support processes of democratic decentralization and political co-production with or without institutional background, in relation with participatory processes.

Law for the Commons

This theme deals with the search of legal opportunities and tools able to guarantee the protection and development of commoning practices, in relation with potential urban commons as well with existing processes and projects It could include the existing knowledge and institutional analysis applied to the management of traditional commons, as well as contemporary legal practices interested in the possibilities of local, national and European legislation, combined with different experiences where these concepts have been applied in the local scale.

Some of the participants have experience in the production of municipal regulations for shared administration of urban commons, as a cadre of legal rules which protects urban commons (squares, gardens, schools, cultural commons, streets, etc.) and compels local governments to collaborate with citizens. The outlined concrete proposals for this theme include the generation of platforms to exchange existing knowledge, experiences and legal mechanisms as well as the production of practical tools to be used at European and local level in relation with legislation, norms and institutional interaction. They also include some resources available such as an Atlas of Urban Commons and a collection of local norms and by-laws,

Food, Health and Leisuer (aka Embodied productions of commoning)

This theme deals with the relation of food production and distribution and sport and leisure activities with the health creation. It will ideally address the different determining factors involved in our physical and mental condition, based on social justice, solidarity economy and respect to the biophysic ecosystems limits, and the importance of self-organised, locally rooted, inclusive and resilient community networks and civic spaces in order to re-think the practices and the development of public policy-making in this domain.

Participants are interested and have experience in the interrelationship at all points of the journey from Land to Fork including access to land, food sovereignty, food growing and distribution, social prescribing, nutrition etc., the new forms of organic food production and the use of “wasteland”, new forms of distribution including recycling, etc., as well as the access to medical knowledge and the patient-guided health policies and the design of health services, the democratization of healthcare and the self-organization of citizen efforts to reduce bureaucratic hurdles, as well as the importance of contesting and contexting in order to reclaim the field for grass-roots sports while challenging norms to inform, emancipate and inspire new models.

Currencies and financing of commons

This theme aims to find ways to strength solidarity economy, its possible articulation with the use of alternative currency and their relation with digital tools and platforms, and the infrastructures and material environments involved in the processes of commoning and the taking of collective responsibility, and how can we multiply or up-scale some of the initiatives, methods, frameworks, formats that were explored locally.

Participants have expressed their interest in strengthening networks and collaborative projects, developing different tools to create an economic alternative to capitalism and fiat money, and to think how to develop an economy based on the commons, as well as strategies and methodologies on how to develop P2P mechanisms of value assessment and exchange. They also have experience in time-baking, are involved in different cooperatives and alternative, have developed crypto-currencies and mobilize economic resources and human partnerships; contribute to community building, disseminate and create awareness and commitment around civic causes, and participate in telecommunications technological projects.

Right to the city (Public Space and Urbanism, Housing, Water&Energy)

This theme gathers different lines of interest about the configuration of the city: Public Spaces & Urbanism, Housing, Tourism, Water&Energy and Culture. Understanding the Right to the City as a collective and bottom-up creation of a new paradigm providing an alternative framework to re-think cities and human settlements on the basis of the principles of social justice, equity, democracy and sustainability, we hope it will help to discuss the processes of commercialization and privatization of public and common goods and resources and how the commons can help creating forms of democratic urban management, how the re-municipalization processes of urban infrastructures can be linked to the discourse of the commons as a reclaim of the public through new forms of social and political participation and the policy frameworks for commons that can be implemented, how can spaces be collectively used so that benefit the common good and what kind of legal and economic frameworks is needed to stabilize practices of commoning.

The participants have expressed their interest in creating spaces for translocal collaboration in commoning through organization that works in different aspects of the urban rights, the production of a cultural ecosystem that integrates citizens, institutions and the territory itself; to collectively develop a perspective on the wider potential(s) of commons based housing across Europe and the possibility to develope long-term affordable housing outside the real-estate market logics,; to promote and support practices that connect practitioners and researchers, professionals and citizens with project initiators, grassroots actors, and activists and to share experiences, examples and tools.
Potential participants also have experience in the organization of collective action projects that challenge gentrification and turistification processes, the redevelopment of empty brownfields and vacant properties, the fight for housing rights in the face of the new real-state cycle, in the set up of a left political platform that was built through mutual action; projects that raise awareness about the importance of commons, designing alternative proposals and publicly advocating solutions through campaigns and public events; the use of community organizing and advocacy planning methodologies to engage local inhabitants; the development conventions to help community-basd projects made by different actors and groups through a collective decision-making mechanism in order to support and strengthen their work; and the construction or urban community garden as learning environments for the parctice of the commons.
Given the wide range of interests and backgrounds, for this theme we can also imagine a mix of general discussions and more specific working spaces, to be decided by the own participants, either in organizational process before the meeting or in situ.