Should we run a telematrix bridge for ourselves?
Shamil PublicSeen by 363Currently, we are using tchncs.de's telegram <=> matrix bridge for a lot of our rooms. The bridge has been under a lot of load lately and there has been talk of running our own telematrix instance.
(GLL uses it the most)
Should we run our own telematrix instance?
proposal by Shamil Closed Sat 6 Jan 2018 4:03PM
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 2 | 100 | 4 |   | |
| Abstain | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Not voted | 43 | 96 |               |
yes, but after we upgrade our server
Yes. If you can get me the specs you need, I can look into getting a server for you.
not functionality, but performance. tchncs.de server is overloaded. If we run our own server, we can avoid delays in messages coming across the bridge.
what we discussed about #hamara is about functionality, telematrix has better features (one to one user mapping) over the irc telegram bot.
👍 agree
We have it running thanks to @balasankarchelamat and @mujeebcpy
Is tchncs.de's bridge not relaying messages properly?
what difference will our own server make in terms of functionalities of the bridge?