I opted to use doodle instead of loomio for the Time poll

👇 👇 👇 👇 👇

https://doodle.com/poll/ny8e7ct2ksbd3ynz

👆 👆 👆 👆 👆

love this! hope it is not named "governance meeting" or "governance circle meeting" - it's too confusing with already a confusing name for our actual governing meeting! Some options in my head: DAC Toolbox meeting, DAC Methods Meeting, Methods Meeting, Methodaology Meeting, Daology Meeting, Methodology Meeting, Governance Tools Meeting, Governance Toolbox Meeting, DeCent Gov, DeCent Governance, DAC in Practice (uh-oh, this one is def pronounced "dack" like quack..)

Haha, well I strrrrrongly recommend governance circle meeting.
My entire reasoning for renaming that meeting was to create space for an actual Governance Circle Meeting (this one), which Kay is now organizing, so hurray! That is THIS meeting. In this way we'll finally have a Meeting for our four circles (Comms/SC/Gov/DApp with their own documentation & processes) + the DAC/Community meeting. If you check the wiki update on staging (https://giveth-wiki-staging.netlify.com ) you will see this is now also the structure of the pages for documenting these 4 + 1 meetings. Same with Giveth.io site: 4+1. Both are for me actually a big part of the plan for bringing clarity in our comms. First proposed that for the wiki a year ago here in Thailand :)
This meeting is not to talk just about the tools or methods, it can start like this but I hope it will grow into more, into the meeting to model governance overall, for us & others, i.e. the Governance Circle Meeting. (see goals of the governance circle in the goals sheet https://docs.google.com/document/d/15bD4zWmNGseSehNMS2ZYVUcTGXKp3B-REFf8A-0B7Xs/edit?usp=sharing)

Ps. Re: 'Our actual governing meeting' -- that's indeed what that is, governing of the DAC. If you find the current one confusing I can actually check to bring it to DAC Meeting (my original proposal). But so that's not the Governance Circle.

Ohhhh this will be a fun share session! On the naming side of things community meeting seems like a strategy meet (rather than governance as previously called) and this sounds like a motion to follow governance meeting processes more carefully :) looking forward to it. I guess to prepare I'll gather links on a wiki page, if people are interested in them we can collaborate on stuff!

I like Gov Lab!

@krisd i see how strongly you are holding onto this from your role in comms. Interestingly you are going against the advice process to keep pushing this so strong. To ignore the reasoned-out perspective of a governance person and mess up names of the work they hold wisdom on and are affected by is pretty against advice process... not sure if you realized what you are doing so perhaps it helps that i point it out here :)

Hey loie, how can I go against the advice process by giving advice from my role? And what reasoned out perspective am I ignoring? I thought that was exactly what I was doing, providing reasoning on why. Does taking the time to explain why I find this important mean that I'm pushing something too strongly? Also don't understand what you mean with 'mess up names of the work they hold wisdom on', as the name Kay started out was actually gov circle meeting.

I like this idea - best to try it out and see it evolve in terms of frequency, naming etc. To be honest, depending on how broadly it goes, this may not be that different from what I was thinking in terms of the 'events' since I was ultimately seeing this as a place to share and learn, and discuss as well.

Time has been found for 1st meeting

gov-lab1

Wednesday, Jan 9th, 16:00 Barcelona === 21:00 Bangkok === 06:00 Los Angeles (more timezones: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20190109T1400)