Poll Created Mon 22 Apr 2013 1:22PM
Procedures for Name Achievment Closed Thu 25 Apr 2013 2:10PM
- (Re)Start pulbic contribution to List and clear it from problematic names (5 days)
- Vote (OMA Members + Active Contributors to OMA Cooker)
- Apply some statistic rule and select the most voted (from 3 to 7 maximum)
- Discuss and take final selection of name in extraordinary council meeting [invite for discussion the TC and the team leaders (if not in council)].
Results
Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 90.0% | 9 | |
Abstain | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Disagree | 10.0% | 1 | ||
Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Undecided | 0% | 56 |
10 of 66 people have participated (15%)
João Azevedo Patrício
Mon 22 Apr 2013 3:39PM
I agree with the procedure. The final choice must, like in Get a Face!, respect at maximum the voting. Only higher concerns should "block" some names.
Kate Lebedeff
Mon 22 Apr 2013 6:24PM
sounds good:)
Colin Close
Tue 23 Apr 2013 10:46PM
This needs to get done fast!!!
Anurag Bhandari
Wed 24 Apr 2013 12:25AM
I'm against such lengthy processes. We are already way behind schedule. I've already vocally put my arguments on MLs. It should be (1) public voting and (2) Council+TC discussion & voting. Period.
Anurag Bhandari Wed 24 Apr 2013 12:26AM
And I feel we should allot a max of 3-5 days to get this done fully.
João Azevedo Patrício Wed 24 Apr 2013 9:00AM
Hi Anurag, This will be fast, I'm trying to get the list for the voting to do it Sunday/Monday and if I get it on time, agenda the meeting for final discussion for Wednesday and a name on Wednesday night.
Guilherme Moro Wed 24 Apr 2013 9:38AM
The timing is still not well define, what are the plans?
From the moment we open a vote for the members how long they will have? Keep in mind that some members that want to vote can't participate in a vote called just couple of days before and closing 1 day after.
João Azevedo Patrício Wed 24 Apr 2013 1:30PM
Guilherme I was thinking of 48h (from Monday 8:am UTC) But warning of the voting Saturday (48 hours) before. I just need the mails from people. if I have the lists, I can schedule everything, no list is impossible to do it.
Colin Close · Tue 23 Apr 2013 10:45PM
One note. Should we also include in 2 anyone who contributed a name? Only one vote though irrespective, of the number of names contributed.