Constitution amendment: add amendments process
Pirate Praveen Mon 30 May 2016 6:10PMPublicSeen by 306Add,
Appendix 3: Amendments
- Everyone is enouraged to suggest amendments
- A member may propose amendments or sponsor amendments suggested by others.
- An amendment is passed by consensus (no objections) among members.
Add amendments process
proposal by Pirate Praveen Closed Mon 6 Jun 2016 6:03PM
Add,
Appendix 3: Amendments
- Everyone is enouraged to suggest amendments
- A member may propose amendments or sponsor amendments suggested by others.
- An amendment is passed by consensus (no objections) among members.
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 1 | 100 | 13 | | |
| Abstain | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 7 | 88 |       |
1 of 8 votes cast (12% participation)
Pirate Praveen
Mon 30 May 2016 6:12PM
This becomes a documentation of the process we already follow
Pirate PraveenTue 31 May 2016 2:46AM
@arjun from now on member always mean permanent member. Only permanent members can propose amendments, others can suggest amendments (ie, a permanent member has to take up that suggestion as amendment, we can call that "sponsored" amendment - same term is used in debian when a member does something on behalf of others)
⚓⚑Arjun⚓⚑Tue 31 May 2016 9:46PM
@praveenarimbrathod understood.. Had another doubt.. What does "no objection" mean here?..
Does it mean a DISAGREE vote or a BLOCK vote?..
Pirate PraveenWed 1 Jun 2016 5:35AM
@arjun no disagees and no blocks.
⚓⚑Arjun⚓⚑ ·Mon 30 May 2016 11:24PM
"A member may propose amendments or sponsor amendments suggested by others."
By "a member", you mean associates as well right?.. If so, pl change it to associate instead of "a member".
So this basically means even associates can suggest amendments but only members(permanent) will be allowed to change it right?