Membership approval

ark Arjun Public Seen by 299

Minimum 2 voting members should approve new membership requests (create a vote when new requests come).

Vidyut

Wed 22 Apr 2015 2:18PM

He's been around and engaged more than I have. Who am I to say no?

Vidyut

Wed 22 Apr 2015 2:26PM

I had previously agreed. But Praveen's comment makes me disagree for now - subject to further clarity.

Pirate Praveen

Thu 23 Apr 2015 7:12AM

He has clarified his position, he only needs clarity on how we plan to ensure rights we recognize.

Pirate Praveen

Thu 23 Apr 2015 7:13AM

He has clarified his position, he only needs clarity on how we plan to ensure rights we recognize.

Vidyut

Thu 23 Apr 2015 9:20AM

He's discussing it. Whatever emerges is fine with me.

Pirate Praveen Mon 20 Apr 2015 6:04PM

@akshay just make sure associate members are added to subgroup.

Vidyut Wed 22 Apr 2015 2:22PM

@praveenarimbrathod I hear your point. Frankly, the constitution needs more work. Why not extend the voting period pending the changes he suggests to the constitution or his disagreements, and we can update the constitution if needed or make a more informed refusal?

In my view, our constitution is very immature at this point and is not really a very refined yardstick for who is worthy of shaping this cause.

Perhaps situations like these can be converted into opportunities by initiating a dialogue and simultaneously refining the constitution to include or explicitly exclude things as our own political vision matures.

Edit: Also, this vote is confusing. If agreement with the constitution is mandatory, then how can membership be put to vote without the agreement?

Pirate Praveen Thu 23 Apr 2015 3:26AM

Yes, we can change the constitution if we have a consensus. Let them propose amendments and we will consider them.

Pirate Praveen Thu 23 Apr 2015 7:19AM

@vidyut, Balu initially did not say he has issues with the constitution. Once voting started he said, he don't agree, then he clarified he only needs clarity on something.