Loomio
Thu 25 Apr 2013 12:04AM

Misc. Privacy

AM( Alex M (Coyo) Public Seen by 9

Other possible Privacy-related sub-planks, such as the abolition of income taxes, the abolition of drug prohibition, the federal criminalization of deep packet inspection, warrantless wiretapping, DRM and spyware.

Should we ratify a constitutional amendment to upgrade the Bill of Rights to include a Right to Privacy? If so, should the right to Privacy include all realtime and asynchronous communications, mail, post and parcels in any form, not just the Federal Express, and any form of civilian encryption? Should it include stronger protections against the invasion and violation of privacy within one's own private property, place of residence, vehicles in public or on roads, bedrooms, bathrooms and schools?

N

Nick Thu 25 Apr 2013 1:00AM

By regulation I mean tax and license the organisations that distribute and sell substances.
I don't want to be snooping in peoples stuff. If its legal to have, no point in regulating their use. Though the trade should be different, we wan't to make sure that all the product is SAFE for the consumer and tax revenues would be nice. Im thinking the DEA (or another agency) because I don't want legislators regulating things, as they are not experts in the area.

AM(

Poll Created Thu 25 Apr 2013 4:57AM

Ratify Constitutional Amendment to Add Right to Privacy to The Bill of Rights Closed Sun 28 Apr 2013 1:21PM

We should add a new right to privacy to the bill of rights with specific and explicit enumerated rights and freedoms from violations and invasions to privacy and the right to pursue life, liberty and happiness on one's own terms, so long as one does not infringe another's rights to the same pursuit.

We should enumerate rights such as:
the freedom from privacy violations by tax collectors, agencies, departments or bureaus in regards to financial status, assets, income level or net worth;
the freedom from wiretapping, packet and frame interception, interference or tampering;
the freedom from interception, tampering, molestation, opening, tracking or interference of postal mail and parcels;
the freedom from domestic surveillance or espionage, especially on private property, on private vehicles and in schools, libraries, charities and cooperatives;
the freedom from reporting or user betrayal by booksellers, publishers, distributors, libraries, content hosts or providers, and medla rental services;
the freedom from any form of law enforcement measures against non-commercial filesharing, overlay networks or alternative communications networks, charities or cooperatives and credit unions.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 75.0% 3 N AJ AM(
Abstain 25.0% 1 BL
Disagree 0.0% 0  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 10 ZAG JO DC JY KSC ER SS GJ LN LF

4 of 14 people have participated (28%)

N

Nick
Agree
Thu 25 Apr 2013 6:40AM

YES YES YES! This has been missing for way too long, we need to guarantee that it is treated as a human right for once.

AM(

Alex M (Coyo)
Agree
Thu 25 Apr 2013 7:09AM

It has. Not only does the bill of rights need to be restored and strengthed, but we need to add the right to privacy to it, and possibly others.

AJ

Amanda Johnson
Agree
Fri 26 Apr 2013 3:09PM

Electronic modes of communication are not being fully protected and the US supreme court has failed in their job to protect them. That is why I think we need to officially protect it.

BL

Benjamin Lyon
Abstain
Fri 26 Apr 2013 6:05PM

I can't decide if this is a good idea or not. Amending the constitution is nearly impossible right now. Shoring up the 4th amendment seems to me like a more feasible option, but an amendment might bring more awareness.

AM(

Alex M (Coyo) Thu 25 Apr 2013 7:25AM

We need to bolster the bill of rights and strengthen and restore the power and clarity of the constitution.

BL

Benjamin Lyon Fri 26 Apr 2013 3:00AM

I am not sure what this is trying to do. A lot of this is covered by 4th amendment. I'm sorry, but most of this is not very clear on what you are protecting from what/who and how/why.