Loomio

Author's photo next to threads

Novica Zivkovic PublicSeen by 88

Issues around the design of the thread starter's photo appearing next the threads

Lets change this

proposal by Novica Zivkovic Closed Sat 14 Nov 2015 10:07PM

Add the author's profile picture to the title of the threads.

Results

Alanna Irving
Abstain

It's a good idea but it should considered as part of a holistic design vision

Greg Cassel
Abstain

Thanks Alanna for identifying my reluctance before I even realized what it was. And thanks Novica for the good idea.

Benjamin Knight
Abstain

I like the idea, contingent on it fitting with the rest of the design

KaNNoN
Abstain

Atualmente propostas podem ter múltiplos autores, assim como podem ser editados posteriormente.
Querem torna-lo um Facebook? Personalista?
Ficaria mais feliz com ideias como colocar um botão de tradução coletiva nos comentários.

Robert Guthrie

@novicaz yea good idea. We tried that recently with the author next to the title, but it made the title feel a big cramped.

I reckon we'll revisit it again soon. Maybe putting the avatar next to the "started by" under the title so the persons face isn't so in your face.

Novica Zivkovic

Maybe circle photo of the author can go on the top of thread title, at center, followed by some smooth line to the small spot just a little above the title...

mix irving

I like the idea. Good suggestion. It's a move toward the first card being a comment-like card.

I think it raises questions about facilitations and ownership of a conversation. I'd be interested to hear whether other people feel ownership and responsibility in conversations they've run. I know I want to make sure it goes well, and I want the context box to be informative and more objective if possible

Presley

I just found this thread because I wanted to suggest making it possible to remove author's pictures from the thread summary! I find it awkward and I think it sends the wrong message - more so with a picture than a name because the picture is more in your face, but in general I think authorship should be something you can check if you want but not a major focus since the purpose is group discussion. I worry that people in my groups will avoid starting threads if it's obvious that only one or two people have started all previous threads. Let me know if I should start a new thread on this.

Alanna Irving

Interesting points! I agree. Also it's weird that threads I started a long time ago still have my face featured prominently when they might now have gone in a totally new direction. I reckon this thread could be a place to talk about the whole issue of the author's picture in general.

James Kiesel

Discourse has a scheme where they display some concoction of the top 4/5 authors in a thread in a row on desktop, with the most recent poster highlighted. On mobile they just display the most recent poster.

I find that scheme a little confusing, and seeing the same group logo over and over again would get really boring (plus pictures of people are always really engaging online). Maybe we could let anyone who has participating in a discussion select the image or something, somewhat akin to slack allowing anyone to set the topic of a channel.

Richard D. Bartlett

The Material design spec recommends that lists are easier to scan if the most distinguishing content in each list item is furtherest to the left (for languages that read left to right).

That's why we chose to put author's photos on the left side of the thread lists: it helps you scan quickly and identify the thread you were looking for, without having to read all the text in detail.

Perhaps we can think of a consistent but more distinctive graphic to put their rather than the author's face, but nothing springs to mind for me.

Matthew Bartlett

I can imagine threads always having a host/facilitator, which defaulted to the person who started the thread; but which could be passed to a new person when appropriate. In that scheme it would be the host's face on the thread.

Presley

Personally, that wouldn't make me feel better. I have two problems:

  1. My face is plastered all over my group's landing page. It makes me want to change my profile picture to a flower or something.
  2. It looks like I'm the only one talking, which isn't true, and which could discourage others from starting threads. It's an accidental accrual of power thing. But my concern is just that it will keep low-engagement groups low-engagement.

Basically, I don't think discussions as they stand now have hosts or authors. I think they have initiators, and we need to know who they are so you can take into account who thought this was worth bringing up, who worded the title, who initially wrote the context, the same as how you show who wrote a comment (those pictures don't bother me at all). But the initiator didn't write the entire thread and doesn't have ownership or responsibility for the entire thread.

I guess there's a design argument for something visual on the left of each thread...I don't know off the top of my head what that should be, but allowing an uploaded picture would make sense, and I could imagine visualizing stats about the thread (like shades of a color spectrum representing how many comments it has). Maybe for some groups the author pictures make sense and they could be optional.

Aaron Thornton

I like the idea of discussion stats, maybe a profile pic of the last person to comment, so it feels a bit more real time.