Loomio
Tue 26 Jan 2016 2:05AM

Framing the Sprints: from 'making' to 'sharing' OERs

MM Matt McGregor Public Seen by 289

Thus far, the sprints have been framed as an opportunity to 'make' new resources for kiwi educators.

But there are plenty of educators that have a bunch of great resources on their hard-drives - and, for many different reasons, have been reluctant to share.

Before we do a bigger promotional push to schools, I'd be interested to see what people think about emphasising the sprints as an opportunity to improve and publish resources - openly and legally - that teachers have already made.

M

Melita Tue 26 Jan 2016 7:40PM

Perhaps we could encourage both things? I think it is a great idea to improve and publish resources, but new resources might be important too.

A few people have said to me that they have 'ideas' for things which they've never followed through because they didn't have the time/support/knowledge so would like to use the Sprint to work on those things...

I wonder whether we need to worry about 're-creating' resources though? What happens if people in different parts of the country are creating resources for the same thing?

WM

William Mckee Wed 27 Jan 2016 12:27AM

Coms platform that will allow each other to see what's being created/worked on. Git is perfect for this - creating the resources in an open format (rst/markdown) and publishing the content as a static site.
Mattermost/irc could also be helpful.

MM

Matt McGregor Wed 27 Jan 2016 1:39AM

@melita - yes, definitely both.

I'm thinking it would be good to have a 'low barrier' way to participate, and bringing in your existing resources to improve seems a way to allow for that.

Re-creating resources is definitely possible. Good communications on what people are working on, as @williammckee says, seems the only way around this. Listing proposed projects on a Wikieducator might also be an option.

DU

Deleted account Mon 1 Feb 2016 7:32AM

I agree with @Melita, there is definitely value in both. Seeing resources already in process could even encourage those who are just starting out.

Wikieducator seems like an easier option for listing resources,. Though Git is great most educators already know how to use wikis and Git has a bit of a learning curve.

I would only go the Git route if we could dedicate some time during the sprints to teaching people how to use it.

DU

Deleted account Mon 1 Feb 2016 7:35AM

Another thought, what about using Etherpad? Is that too simplistic/collaborative?

M

Melita Thu 4 Feb 2016 10:49PM

Good idea @Jess! Etherpad is really good, but is sort of limited to document writing. Maybe we could have Etherpad as one of the tools and some others as well? We were wondering whether some kind of file sharing might be needed as well (I don't think you can do that via Wikieducator?). Perhaps Wikieducator as a place to plan projects, invite participation, add updates and publish final versions, and other tools for the 'doing'?

MM

Matt McGregor Wed 10 Feb 2016 2:37AM

I like the idea of giving people the option of what tools to use, while maintaining a 'central' listing on Wikieducator of work being done on the day(s).

K

Kay Tue 16 Feb 2016 10:00PM

Talking with Creative Commons (if not already done) and Open Source community about effective ways to share may be useful too. What standards for re-use etc? Sorry if this already covered elsewhere. I came here via National Digital Forum newsletter & I'm instantly enthusiastic :-)

MM

Matt McGregor Tue 16 Feb 2016 10:03PM

We're covering the legal reuse side, for sure (I'm from CC, so I can't let that slip!). I think we can definitely produce guidance. We (CC) have quite a lot of educator-specific guidance, though we don't touch on technologies as such.

K

Kay Tue 16 Feb 2016 10:11PM

Yes I was about to jump back and edit out the CC refs. My bad. I'll add myself to intros.

Load More