Tue 8 May 2018 4:08PM

Report: Open & collaborative developments

M mike_hales Public Seen by 106

FYI The STEPS centre has published a report which looks at some challenges and joins up with economic development policy research . .
>Experimentation with radically open and collaborative ways of producing knowledge and material artefacts can be found everywhere, from the free/libre and open-source software movement to citizen science initiatives, and from community-based fabrication laboratories and makerspaces to the production of open-source scientific hardware. Spurred on by the widespread availability of networked digital infrastructure, what such initiatives share in common is the (re)creation of knowledge commons, and an attempt to redistribute innovative agency across a broad array of actors.

>In this working paper we reflect on what these emerging practices might mean for helping to cultivate more equitable and sustainable patterns of global development. For many commentators and activists such initiatives promise to radically alter the ways in which we produce knowledge and material artefacts – in ways that are far more efficient, creative, distributed, decentralised, and democratic. Such possibilities are intriguing, but also not without critical challenges.

>We argue that key to appreciating if and how collaborative, commons-based production can fulfil such promises and contribute to more equitable and sustainable patterns of development, are a series of challenges concerning the knowledge politics and political economy of the new practices. We ask: what depths and forms of participation are being enabled through the new practices? In what sense does openness translate into the ability to use knowledge? Who is able to influence and control open and collaborative production? Who is able to allocate resources to, and to capture benefits from, the new initiatives? And will open and collaborative forms of production create new relations with, or even transform, markets, states, and civil society, or will they be captured by sectional interests?

Not unfamiliar questions!


Liam Murphy Tue 8 May 2018 6:33PM

Thanks Mike - looks very interesting

Best Wishes
Liam Murphy

Gallery133 / @culturebanks


www.gallery133.net ( http://www.gallery133.net/ )
[email protected]

Tel: 07882 934100

This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorised disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with me by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. I am not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and deny any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of myself and no other company.


Michel Bauwens Tue 8 May 2018 10:46PM

very pertinent to our concerns, thanks!


mike_hales Tue 8 May 2018 10:58PM

There's a related 2016 book, Grassroots innovation movements . .

in the STEPS Centre’s Pathways to Sustainability series, looks at how six grassroots innovation movements around the world have developed, and what challenges they face

This pre-publication blurb includes a download link for chapter 1 of the book.