Loomio
Thu 22 Aug 2013 5:15PM

Gathering Artwork, Communication, Websites and Marketing in one team

RJ Raphaël Jadot Public Seen by 266

Decision coming from a topic initiated in council mailing list

This proposal because the frontier between all these roles is thin and variable, and we're a small team now :) IMHO splitting in dedicated teams should be more spontaneous and flexible.

This vision doesn't mean there is no specific role or responsibility, nor that there will never be no subteam. Just that, as for QA, subteams will imho be created by need, when there will be enough people to make them :)

RJ

Raphaël Jadot Fri 23 Aug 2013 8:31AM

Mageia also did the same: https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Atelier_team

JAP

João Azevedo Patrício Fri 23 Aug 2013 9:14AM

I agree with this. Already discuss this with @raphaeljadot. I have some issues with the namings. this is a kind of semi-autonomous teams concept applied from industrial works. For this we need to have a clear view of all, first the way it works, bottom top, horizontal, top bottom, etc.. The strategy for each area how is defined and by who, and finally how the roles are assigned. the fact is that we all are a kind of factotum, and we should be more organic, so this merge for me is obvious but we cannot call it teams. I guess we can find a good name (i don't like circles), and we can use the old artisan production model as theme (whiteout masters and apprentices :-)).

JAP

João Azevedo Patrício Fri 23 Aug 2013 9:15AM

@raphaeljadot for me Oficina sounds good, Oficina is the Portuguese word for workshop. It also makes sense. I don't know how it sound for a russian or english speaker.

JAP

João Azevedo Patrício Fri 23 Aug 2013 9:17AM

for me the natural organization will be as a big large "team", on that team should be defined roles first based on needs, then look at skills and see if there is any gap on the relation skills > needs. After that people naturally position themselves and council acts as a "manager" trying to fill the gaps.

JAP

João Azevedo Patrício Fri 23 Aug 2013 9:21AM

Regarding leadership. There should not be that kind of mentality in this, I prefer someone coordinating each team of needs. I'm actually responsible for this area in council, that means I have to draw and make the best effort to achieve and design the strategy for the area. I haven't done it yet, or I've been quite week doing it. So I suggest, that during this merge a brainstorming of the "oficina" takes place to identify the strategy flaws, etc... I would call those brainstorming not meetings but "tertúlias" and would keep it in PT for my monstrous EGO feeding. :-)

RJ

Raphaël Jadot Fri 23 Aug 2013 12:38PM

@joaoazevedopatricio1 yes this is the spirit i try to have, not a leadership but coordination

AB

Anurag Bhandari Sat 24 Aug 2013 2:49AM

But I'm unsure on whether we can use the word "oficina." I don't even know how to pronounce it. For such a diverse and global community, we may want to come up with an easy to spell / pronounce Latin or English name (could be an invented name as well, using the rules of etymology). I will think about such a name. Until then, Wingardium Leviosa.

KL

Kate Lebedeff Sat 24 Aug 2013 7:31PM

@anuragbhandari I agree about the name thing, probably something easier would be better. Also, which would give a clear a straight idea of what is it about:)

JAP

João Azevedo Patrício Sat 24 Aug 2013 8:30PM

@anuragbhandari @katelebedeff The translation of Oficina is workshop. Related to latim, Oficina comes from the latin word "officina" (another f added) :-).
It's a word that is similar and recognizable in lot's of languages. But like I said in a non "latin" world I don't know how people will accept it or it will sound.
The way to pronounce is dependes on the language hehehe :-)

KL

Kate Lebedeff Sun 25 Aug 2013 5:34PM

@joaoazevedopatricio1 yeees, I understand, imo it would be good to have the subject of the workshop more clear - straight in the name. Just my 2 cents:)

Load More