What are our next steps?
At our last meeting on Tuesday the 20th, I asked you all to think about next steps we should take to move things forward. This is a place to start to gather and refine ideas for next steps.
Add a comment with any ideas you have to get the ball rolling. When it feels like we have a specific proposal, we can start a proposal decision to test that out.
Poll Created Fri 6 Apr 2018 9:10PM
All-for-one or a Four-for-all? Closed Sat 14 Apr 2018 12:03AM
It seems like there's consensus that we will each do our own mini-project / goal as a test.
We agreed in principle to try out the S3.41 process idea on ourselves as a way to test it out. The question is, do we want to all work together on one goal / focus area or do we each want to try it out on our one first? Pick one option and leave a statement about why you picked what you picked. You can also add a new option if you would like.
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
We each work on four separate goals / projects. | 100.0% | 3 |
|
||
| We all work on one goal / project plan. | 0.0% | 0 | ||||
| Undecided | 0% | 1 |
|
3 of 4 people have participated (75%)
Rgj Maurice Sat 7 Apr 2018 6:08PM
I know I was pushing for one goal, but I have enough of my own projects that working on my own stuff is just as useful. :O)
witworks1 Mon 9 Apr 2018 10:35PM
Now leaning to each work on now project-if we work on the forestry project Plan B together we may get attached to our plans and solutions and find hard to let others 'in' (and if the systems is truly to make better collaboration we meed to be wary f.
E Thu 12 Apr 2018 11:06PM
Having multiple projects on the go will be a more realistic test of the systems.
Poll Created Fri 6 Apr 2018 9:25PM
Plan B Presentation Feedback Closed Sat 14 Apr 2018 12:03AM
I propose that we create a new thread on Loomio specifically to capture feedback on the content to include in the Plan B Presentation and use it as an engagement tool with the Brain Trust. We can attach the current PowerPoint (see attached) as the basis for the discussion. As the "context statement" we include the following:
purpose: to engage potential Plan B partners and provide them with enough information to feel comfortable taking the next step.
audience: potential supporters and partners in Plan B. mostly likely people with an interest in: sustainable /regenerative farming; happiness / quality of life / flow; the commons / cooperative economy, community resilience, intentional simplicity, or climate change response.
expected outcomes: the presentation will include a "next step" slides with specific actions for people to take, initially focused on developing a pool of self-identified "interested" folks.
Because we recognize that different audiences will have different interests, part of the feedback we are looking for is:
Which elements should be included in every presentation? What's the 'core content"?
What elements make most sense to use with specific audiences? When to include / exclude?
What is the best sequence for maximum effect and understanding?
Other feedback, is of course, welcome.
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 0.0% | 0 | |
| Abstain | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Block | 100.0% | 1 |
|
|
| Undecided | 0% | 3 |
|
1 of 4 people have participated (25%)
E
Thu 12 Apr 2018 11:07PM
I'd like to give feedback, but this space closes on Friday, and I won't have time to look at it until the weekend.
Ben Kadel Sun 15 Apr 2018 9:50PM
We should probably talk about what a reasonable response window is.
Poll Created Sun 15 Apr 2018 10:01PM
Proposal: Brain Trust Report Back Closed Thu 19 Apr 2018 2:01AM
We send an email with the following bullet points and then follow-up with a group call to discuss next steps (including the questions for discussion).
Bullet points include:
A summary of activity since the December 2017 update
o Ben and Roland move to Victoria
o Exploring interim farming options (Whalewych)
o B+R+E+A meet periodically
o Exploring concepts, tools, collaboration platforms (no need to re-invent the wheel)
o Discovery of: Sociocracy and v3.41
o Big next step: seeking to engage with a new group to try out 3.41 and to move the whole plan forward.
o Figuring out what/how to communicate. Lots of deep effort/thought here!
Questions for discussion:
1) Would you like to continue acting as an advisor?
2) Would you be willing to provide feedback on the new “hook” presentation?
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 33.3% | 1 |
|
| Abstain | 33.3% | 1 |
|
|
| Disagree | 33.3% | 1 |
|
|
| Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 0% | 1 |
|
3 of 4 people have participated (75%)
Ben Kadel
Sun 15 Apr 2018 10:03PM
In general, I like the approach but would like some clarification on a few points. Are we thinking that each bullet point would be just that or would there be more info? How do we get enough meat without getting long-winded.
Ben Kadel · Fri 6 Apr 2018 9:04PM
In the spirit of "good enough for now / safe enough to try" - since this is the "Next Steps" thread and we talked about a few next steps at our last meeting, I thought I would post them here for the record and then try using a few different "decision tools" so that we can get familiar with the formats.
Identified Next Steps:
1) Clarify the purpose, audience, and expected outcomes of the Plan B presentation.
2) Solicit feedback on the presentation content.
3) Decide if the four of us will try out the S3.41 process on one shared idea or four individual ideas.
Am I missing anything? ("Happy Face" if you have nothing to add. Comment if you have an additional Next Step.
(Decision Tools to follow)