Sub-groups

I still think we have more subgroups than people to occupy them. I think we need to focus our efforts better and that we could do this if we were not so fractured. Most of the tasks are tended to from within the core group and don't yet need a separate place to communicate.

Also, we went through a phase of creating lots of new subgroups. I saw this as pointless activity with no productive results and as a result I tuned out. I become engaged when I see people doing things that produce useful results.

Could we please try to restrict the creation of new groups until we have a group of people (other than the core) to fill them.

I went through the list of Sub-groups and these are my thoughts.

Administration - 2 conversations of no importance. recommend delete.

AEC - 0 conversations. Recommend delete.

Database - has an importand conversation and is an important group. I recommend to keep but would be receptive to deleting if others thought it should be.

Election Campaign Volunteers - Important. Is filling with outside volunteers. Keep

Fundraising - Not active yet, but is important. Keep (unless we delete and recreate when becomes needed).

Graphics - No conversations. Recommend delete. If we get a group of graphics people they could make their own decision to create a new group. At the moment we don't have a graphics group so we don't need this loomio group.

Media - There is one conversation. I think media is currently a role of the core group. I think we should consider deleting this group for now and recreating it later if we think it is necessary.

Petition creator - No discussions yet. Delete now and recreate again when it becomes necessary.

Public Relations - Lots of conversations. Keep.

Short clip guru - Delete, if we can.

Social Media - Keep.

Software - Keep

Website - Keep

So the groups we would keep are:
Database
Election Campaign Volunteers
Fundraising
Public Relations
Social Media
Software
Website