Simpler rules for accepting HF reimbursements
Paolo Cavallini
Public
Seen by 171
Should we replace the current rules for applying for HF reimbursement with the following:
* in order to obtain a reimbursement, the applicant should be endorsed by at least one core dev, in the limits of existing budget
Poll Created Wed 10 Jun 2015 2:48PM
Change the rules? Closed Sat 13 Jun 2015 2:07PM
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 57.1% | 4 |
|
| Abstain | 42.9% | 3 |
|
|
| Disagree | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 0% | 4 |
|
7 of 11 people have participated (63%)
gurlinthewurld
Fri 12 Jun 2015 1:12PM
Being a noob to this group, I'm not sure what the topic is about, so I'll be interested in learning more. Abstaining for now.
Tim Sutton Thu 11 Jun 2015 11:17AM
Can you provide the complete text of the request for travel funding page?
Tim Sutton Thu 11 Jun 2015 11:17AM
The one that you propose to replace the current one I mean.
Paolo Cavallini Thu 11 Jun 2015 12:28PM
Sure. I would like to keep it as simple and short ass possible. Do you heve suggestions on what to add?
Thanks.
Tim Sutton Sat 13 Jun 2015 4:42AM
I tidied up the formatting a bit on
Personally I don't see any problem with the current text. We could perhaps remove the 40 days part and add a bullet that says that devs receiving reimbursement should post a blog post (to the new official QGIS blog?).
Andreas Neumann · Thu 11 Jun 2015 6:30AM
I would also suggest that we would ask all participants who receive travel support, that they would write a blog post about what they did at the meeting.