I think it sounds sweeter and smoother, DACK sounds harsh

Just like DAO is DAO!

Simplicity is key when users are involved! 3 syllables compared to one makes "dack" the winner for me. Few people say "Dee Eh Oh" for DAO to my knowledge, and if that's what we're modeling the term after, I would say the convention to say it as one word follows through.

If we use abbreviation I'm for the shortest/easiest possible

Jee Dee Ay Communitay

the other option sounds like duck

in lazy moments i might say dack but all front facing interactions get D-A-C because of clarity/approachability. Bowen said it well.

$100 DAI (looks best with a space)

$100 DAI (looks best with a space)

100 DAI - I agree it looks best with a space - but I think DAI Stablecoin is known to be a $1 / 1 DAI conversion. You can see https://medium.com/cryptolinks/maker-for-dummies-a-plain-english-explanation-of-the-dai-stablecoin-e4481d79b90 for more info. Even exchanges only use the coin name.

$100 (in DAI tokens)

If you want to make a clear link in people's minds that what is being sent is equivalent to dollars, then $100 DAI works fine. Crypto-savvy people will also know what you mean.

100 DAI (with the space)

There is a space between the amount and the denominater I hope =) ... i.e. 100 DAI

There is a space between the amount and the denominater I hope =) ... i.e. 100 DAI

100 DAI (looks best with a space). Changed my vote as per meeting :)

Maybe we should broadly call them proposals, actions or buckets or whatever... but then name different types... Like right now we have Bounties, and soon we will have an option without reviewers, which might be best know as a Fund...

Bucket is the term used by Cobudget - in our system I think it makes more sense for campaigns than for milestones

Could we please not just change terms 'quick quick' in the DApp that are used in all articles both by us and others, on the wiki, many many many recorded talks and YouTube descriptions, not to mention in about 500 places in the dapp without it being part of a wider, written out strategy? I get the logic but can we do this at the appropriate time if needed, when revising the building blocks? If not I propose the initiator of the proposal (you 🙂) also makes sure this term is updated throughout

Maybe I'm getting too deep into this, but I think we need to define the nested structure of these levels of organization, rather than just defining one level. I would say the order that makes sense to me (in the context of charities who may want to use our platform) is:

Campaign >> Milestones >> Tasks

So a campaign could be to "Trash Hero Thailand"
One milestone within that campaign could be "Clean up Railay Beach"
And one task within that milestone could be "Organize materials for cleanup"

Maybe I'm getting too deep into this, but I think we need to define the nested structure of these levels of organization, rather than just defining one level. I would say the order that makes sense to me (in the context of charities who may want to use our platform) is:

Campaign >> Milestones >> Tasks

So a campaign could be "Trash Hero Thailand"
One milestone within that campaign could be "Clean up Railay Beach"
And one task within that milestone could be "Organize materials for cleanup"

"Action item" is the most accurate in my mind, but it doesn't really roll off the tongue. "Accomplishment" kind of captures this meaning but sounds a little presumptuous. "Deed" kind of captures it too but sounds funky for some reason, so I'd say "task" or "job" make the most sense to use

I'm going with "Job" because only one person gets paid for each of these completed--i.e. they are individual. In practice, they could be already completed or a proposal for future work, so "proposal" doesn't always fit. "Job" can encompass several "tasks" which these can do.

I agree with Jeff's breakdown - a task, action, deed or job is a sub-item within a Milestone. I like Milestone best, with Mission and Goal following in favor. Project works as a Campaign can have multiple projects.. A n equivalent (doesn't appear I can add options?) would be Activity or Initiative, which can be comprised of multiple actions/tasks.

I like Jeff and Dani's breakdown. That's the way I've often seen it in project management tools. I would not recommend we change this label in isolation however. For example if we changed the label from milestone to project then someone else might ask what is the difference between a project and a campaign. This also makes me wonder if Loomio is the best tool for these kinds of decisions. Is this binding or simply ideas for another circle.

Definitely not "Project" as that's sort of what a campaign is!

Output item?

Output item?

I think I prefer the "action focused" language and propose to call it "the work" or "work"

Maybe we should broadly call them proposals, actions or buckets or whatever... but then name different types... Like right now we have Bounties, and soon we will have an option without reviewers, which might be best know as a Fund...

"Issues/feedback". "Need help?"

"Feedback" / "Have a Problem?"

We should autofill the title and description too

It depends what our goal is with this button. General feedback? Tech support? It currently leads to an empty new issue. This won't work for most non-technical people; "What's github and what the heck do I do with these fields?? Oh well this clearly isn't for me"
I really like projects I've seen where when you click the support button or create a new issue at all, there is ghost text in the body of the issue that guides them thru what to write & attach.

It depends what our goal is with this button. General feedback? Tech support? It currently leads to an empty new issue. This won't work for most non-technical people; "What's github and what the heck do I do with these fields?? Oh well this clearly isn't for me"
I really like projects I've seen where when you click the support button or create a new issue at all, there is ghost text in the body of the issue that guides them thru what to write & attach.