Loomio
Sat 26 May 2018 3:36AM

New page: PreVH Development Status

BB Brent Barker Public Seen by 308

I just created a development status page, including my best guess at our actual operating principles, current production status, and feature requests.

Please edit or make comments there or here to make it match your understanding.

https://nvc.miraheze.org/wiki/PreVH_Development_Status

D

Dieudonné Sat 26 May 2018 8:40AM

Thank you Brent for initiating this page !

D

Poll Created Sat 26 May 2018 8:48AM

"PreVH Development Status" page as common reference Closed Tue 5 Jun 2018 8:03AM

Outcome
by Dieudonné Tue 5 Jun 2018 8:46AM

The discussion continues here : Governance: How to change Operating Principles

To use the PreVH Development Status page, as our reference about what we agree on. As soon as there's something on it we don't agree on, we move it in a place where it's clear that there's no consensus about it. At the bottom of the page or in the discussion tab.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 80.0% 4 D E J KH
Abstain 0.0% 0  
Disagree 20.0% 1 BB
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 24 JB EW X IP GS P RJ UK E BW MN SV IM JS TS PV SB KT M BR

5 of 29 people have voted (17%)

D

Dieudonné
Agree
Sat 26 May 2018 8:53AM

If we agree on this proposition, there will be no more need to keep Brent's warnings at the top of the page PreVH Development Status

D

Dieudonné
Agree
Sat 26 May 2018 8:53AM

If we agree on this proposition, there will be no more need to keep Brent's warnings at the top of the PreVH Development Status page

D

Dieudonné
Agree
Sat 26 May 2018 8:53AM

If we agree on this proposition, there will be no more need to keep Brent's warnings at the top of the PreVH Development Status page.

KH

Kirstin Heidler
Agree
Mon 28 May 2018 8:59AM

Agree in the sense of agreeing not that it currently is that way. I.e. this is how the code is, which may not be in alignment with what we want it to be.

KH

Kirstin Heidler
Agree
Mon 28 May 2018 9:00AM

Agree in the sense of agreeing that it currently is that way. I.e. this is how the code is, which may not be in alignment with what we want it to be.

E

Elkie
Agree
Tue 29 May 2018 6:14AM

Many thanks for getting this together. Xxx

BB

Brent Barker
Disagree
Mon 4 Jun 2018 7:11PM

Preferring my own proposal, where we do not move things in the Operating Principles until we first bring it up with the weave.