Decide on the statutes principles for the asset-holding association
Objective
Reach consensus on the principles behind the statutes.
The logic behind it would be better to set on stone the big principles of the association before writing the statues.
Open to discussion.
Links
Poll Created Thu 23 Jan 2020 4:49PM
Name Closed Thu 9 Apr 2020 1:14PM
OpenFisca
OpenFisca Shared-Assets Holding
Results
Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 33.3% | 2 | |
Abstain | 50.0% | 3 | ||
Disagree | 16.7% | 1 | ||
Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Undecided | 0% | 0 |
6 of 6 people have participated (100%)
Laurent Bossavit
Wed 18 Mar 2020 4:51PM
I'd go with just "OpenFisca"
Thomas
Wed 18 Mar 2020 7:04PM
I agree with Laurent. OpenFisca is enough.
Matti Schneider
Wed 1 Apr 2020 1:31PM
I'd rather have OpenFisca Foundation, but I like that the name makes explicit the specific aim of the entity.
Sandra Chakroun
Wed 1 Apr 2020 9:33PM
I disagree with the term "holding" as it sounds like a business group. I'm fine with OpenFisca [shared assets/Foundation] 🙂
Mahdi Ben Jelloul
Sun 5 Apr 2020 3:20PM
Simple and clear OpenFisca
Poll Created Thu 23 Jan 2020 4:56PM
Object Closed Wed 8 Apr 2020 10:02AM
We're going to propose a counter-proposition.
To protect the « shared assets », whether owned (brand) or stewarded (access to Github)
What is a shared asset in the context of this association ?
the brand, which allows the general public to identify OpenFisca;
resources that allow the community to use OpenFisca;
resources that allow the community to contribute to OpenFisca.
What is not a shared asset in the context of this association ?
the code itself;
the way people maintain and contribute to OpenFisca;
the way we finance OpenFisca development, nor the management of those funds.
Results
Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 20.0% | 1 | |
Abstain | 60.0% | 3 | ||
Disagree | 20.0% | 1 | ||
Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Undecided | 0% | 0 |
5 of 5 people have participated (100%)
Laurent Bossavit
Wed 18 Mar 2020 4:52PM
Would prefer this if it stated an active duty to preserve OF's status as a commons.
Thomas
Wed 18 Mar 2020 7:07PM
I would explicit the prevention of enclosure of OpenFisca as a digital common.
Matti Schneider · Thu 2 Apr 2020 7:10AM
> I was highly inspired by their own statutes for this proposal
Interesting! I guess this explains some of the limitations I have spotted in the proposed articles, where I feel that the to-be association wants to manage a good without owning it, whereas I expect it to fully own it (so that no one else does).