Once a recommendation has been made to an agency, SOF involvement stops. Annually SOF states what % of recommendations are adopted
Poll Created Tue 25 Sep 2012 1:54AM
Once a recommendation has been made to an agency, SOF involvement stops. Annually SOF states what % of recommendations are adopted Closed Fri 5 Oct 2012 4:37AM
The event forum's recommendations to QLDC have been partly implemented. Is it dangerous ground to get in there and try and change or speed up an agencies response? A slippery slope?
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 50.0% | 1 |
|
| Abstain | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 50.0% | 1 |
|
|
| Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 0% | 5 |
|
2 of 7 people have participated (28%)
Steve Henry
Tue 25 Sep 2012 1:55AM
If we are a "vioce" then we need to remain independent from agencies and thus be able to comment on how well adopted a recommendation has been
Steve Henry
Tue 25 Sep 2012 1:55AM
If we are a "voice" then we need to remain independent from agencies and thus be able to comment on how well adopted a recommendation has been
[email protected]
Tue 25 Sep 2012 9:39AM
Using the current instance as an example, we have reconvened a task force because of misunderstandings. I have communicated concerns about the agency approach and it is being mitigated. Outcomes of this intervention are likely to help.
[email protected] Tue 25 Sep 2012 9:33AM
Does that mean task forces can't be reconvened? If so this would mean the task force delivers its report and has no further say in what happens. I'm not sure this fixed approach would meet the prioritising criteria?
[email protected] Tue 25 Sep 2012 9:40AM
disagreement! can we cope?
Steve Henry Tue 25 Sep 2012 9:31PM
Yes task forces need to be re convened............ agencies need to step up and adopt recommendations without tinkering as has happened here.................
Sofia · Tue 25 Sep 2012 2:44AM
Is there not some responsibility to those involved in the process that it is followed up once it is recommended to the agency so it is not about relinquishing control to another entity. I think it is necessary to 'get in there' and be clear about a time frame and to know that the momentum to find alternatives doesn't die because the agency takes so long to reply. Also what are the plan B's and C's if the agency rejects it or fails to implement?