Loomio
Fri 7 Dec 2018 12:12AM

Resolution to adopt the Secretary Protocol

TF

Poll Created Fri 7 Dec 2018 12:13AM

Shall EBFE adopt the Secretary Protocol? Closed Thu 13 Dec 2018 12:02AM

Outcome
by Torrie Fischer Thu 13 Dec 2018 12:05AM

We have consensus on adopting the Protocol. I will make a motion to ratify our consensus at tonight's monthly meeting.

Proposed resolution: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZUn3KhfC3ZaKMzBVqGxAPEyidPt6O_MOBBRV7RWYtTM/edit#

  • An Agree vote means you think this proposal is great and we should pass it at the December 12th monthly meeting
  • An abstention vote means you do not disagree with the proposal, nor do you feel a strong need to pass this proposal.
  • A disagree vote means you think this proposal has significant issues that you will commit to working out in time for the next January meeting
  • A block means there are significant problems with this proposal and it must not be adopted.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 100.0% 12 KD GM LZ DU EB AT EL BK JL CK IM LL
Abstain 0.0% 0  
Disagree 0.0% 0  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 19 TF PA K IM CG DC JD SS BE AE ET P SD DS AV AG JM RM

12 of 31 people have participated (38%)

IM

Ian Monroe
Agree
Fri 7 Dec 2018 12:30AM

thanks for everyone's work on this!

EL

Eric Lombardo
Agree
Fri 7 Dec 2018 12:44AM

I appreciate the thoughtfulness and intentionality behind this proposal!

LL

Libby Lee-Egan
Agree
Fri 7 Dec 2018 4:27AM

taking pressure off the secretary and formalizing a process for meeting agendas sounds good to me.

GM

Greg Magofna
Agree
Sat 8 Dec 2018 8:39PM

Printed agendas? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

IM

Poll Created Thu 13 Dec 2018 6:57PM

Should we endorse and work to support Senator Wiener's SB50? Closed Sat 15 Dec 2018 8:02PM

A intro to the bill from California YIMBY is here:
https://cayimby.org/more-homes-act-introduction/

Alfred made a good cartoon:
https://www.thebaycitybeacon.com/politics/a-housing-bill-explained---bad-side-of-the/article_03aa6e68-fe6f-11e8-9acb-d35c5d20076f.html

The tl;dr is that it allows more dense housing construction around transit and also in exclusionary zoned job-rich cities like Palo Alto. It would be a powerful tool to allow more housing, supporting traditional EB4E priorities like #UpzoneRockridge and the N. Berkeley BART.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 100.0% 24 TF KD CG DC LZ DU JD SS AT EL TS CL IM LL AE P DS AG JM JM
Abstain 0.0% 0  
Disagree 0.0% 0  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 11 PA GM K IM EB BE CK ET SD AV

24 of 35 people have participated (68%)

LL

Libby Lee-Egan
Agree
Thu 13 Dec 2018 7:02PM

hell yeah it's like SB827's better looking cousin

IM

Ian Monroe
Agree
Thu 13 Dec 2018 7:03PM

let's make Livable California sad

LZ

Liat Z
Agree
Thu 13 Dec 2018 7:30PM

Let's get this baby going!

WL

Watson Ladd
Agree
Sat 15 Dec 2018 5:40PM

Would be great if it included more transit funding