Clear ML list and definitions
Should we ask heads of teams to prepare clear descriptions of relevant MLs, to have the clear list with definitions, which topics go to which MLs?
Do we ask team leaders to do so?
proposal by Kate Lebedeff Closed Tue 2 Apr 2013 5:27PM
Results
| Results | Option | Votes | % of votes cast | % of eligible voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | 6 | 100 | 46 |    | |
| Abstain | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Block | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 7 | 54 |    |
6 of 13 votes cast (46% participation)
Bernhard Rosenkränzer
Sun 31 Mar 2013 11:13PM
Definitely. We should try not to create too many lists while we're such a small group though.
Wayne SalleeTue 2 Apr 2013 2:32PM
Let's try to make what we are voting on more clear. :-)
Let's put discussion in the discussion, and vote info in the vote info.
"Do we want to do so?" does not work well in my opinion. :-)
Kate Lebedeff ·Mon 1 Apr 2013 8:07AM
to Bero: yes. This would be to have clarity for already existing MLs (quoting Raph's idea, in fact)