Agreeing our decision-making protocol for UNicoins team?
In today's weekly meeting (23/11/20), we agreed that we could experiment with Loomio during the trial period for some of our decisions as a group - e.g. this could include agreeing on a plan for our prototype, how we plan to work with other teams and collaborators, etc.
It could be helpful to agree on how we want to take decisions in our group here perhaps? @Marc Liberati created a proposal in the general Loomio thread before about, for example, fractions % that need to agree to a certain decision for it to go through etc. Perhaps we can discuss here in a thread then one or more of us can make proposals around this, iterating to find something we agree to?
Poll Created Wed 25 Nov 2020 2:53PM
decision-making protocol stage 1 Disable voting
Should we try the "work in progress" function to work on something together before actually voting on it? @Marc Liberati suggested that it would be good to cover the below, maybe we can start with quorum & minimum threshold for UNicoins team?
Propose that for major decisions such as anything involving financial implications or new team members or focus of prototype, that we need at least 60% of core team present? [i'm just improvising here, look forward to others ideas]
(points made by @Marc Liberati proposal windows, timing, quorum & minimum threshold, % votes required to pass, abstentions, blocking rights, core governance consensus etc)
|Current results||Option||% of points||Voters|
|Undecided||0%||8||SB EG AC|
0 of 8 people have voted (0%)