Multi-Winner Plurality PR?
WONK TALK: @adamzielinski had an idea the other day in the middle of our meeting. It was a response to a non-PR multi winner approval system. Here it is if I have it right:
What if you did a multi-winner system where everyone voted for one candidate. Plurality style. If there are 5 seats the top five get elected. Isn't this sort of a crude PR?
It's not expressive or really honest, and it maintains the spoiler effect, but it seems pretty damn equal and I wonder how accurate it might be?